Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571890›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2020

Exploiting replicative stress in gynecological cancers as a therapeutic strategy.

Natalie Yl Ngoi, Vignesh Sundararajan, David Sp Tan

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Ovarian cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Acquired resistance to molecularly targeted therapies for cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie Yl NgoiNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2071-0715
Vignesh SundararajanCancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
David Sp TanNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore david_sp_tan@nuhs.edu.sg.
National University of Singapore · SGNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elevated levels of replicative stress in gynecological cancers arising from uncontrolled oncogenic activation, loss of key tumor suppressors, and frequent defects in the DNA repair machinery are an intrinsic vulnerability for therapeutic exploitation. The presence of replication stress activates the DNA damage response and downstream checkpoint proteins including ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related kinase (ATR), checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1), and WEE1-like protein kinase (WEE1), which trigger cell cycle arrest while protecting and restoring stalled replication forks. Strategies that increase replicative stress while lowering cell cycle checkpoint thresholds may allow unrepaired DNA damage to be inappropriately carried forward in replicating cells, leading to mitotic catastrophe and cell death. Moreover, the identification of fork protection as a key mechanism of resistance to chemo- and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy in ovarian cancer further increases the priority that should be accorded to the development of strategies targeting replicative stress. Small molecule inhibitors designed to target the DNA damage sensors, such as inhibitors of ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM), ATR, CHK1 and WEE1, impair smooth cell cycle modulation and disrupt efficient DNA repair, or a combination of the above, have demonstrated interesting monotherapy and combinatorial activity, including the potential to reverse drug resistance and have entered developmental pipelines. Yet unresolved challenges lie in balancing the toxicity profile of these drugs in order to achieve a suitable therapeutic index while maintaining clinical efficacy, and selective biomarkers are urgently required. Here we describe the premise for targeting of replicative stress in gynecological cancers and discuss the clinical advancement of this strategy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2DNADNA DamageDNA RepairDNA ReplicationFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleGenomic InstabilityHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyOncogene ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanATR protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCheckpoint Kinase 1Checkpoint Kinase 2CHEK1 protein, humanCHEK2 protein, humanDNAOncogene ProteinsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesWEE1 protein, humancervical cancermedical oncologyovarian canceruterine cancer

Identifiers

PMID32571890
PMCPMC7418601
OpenAlexW3036067103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.