Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571843›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2020

Impact of Cysteine Residues on MHC Binding Predictions and Recognition by Tumor-Reactive T Cells.

Abraham Sachs, Eugene Moore, Zeynep Kosaloglu-Yalcin, Bjoern Peters, John Sidney, Steven A Rosenberg, Paul F Robbins, Alessandro Sette

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Design of solubly expressed miniaturized SMART MHCs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abraham SachsSurgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1201.ORCID 0000-0002-5322-4388
Eugene MooreLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA 92037; and.
Zeynep Kosaloglu-YalcinLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA 92037; and.ORCID 0000-0003-0961-5055
Bjoern PetersLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA 92037; and.ORCID 0000-0002-8457-6693
John SidneyLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA 92037; and.ORCID 0000-0002-0987-405X
Steven A RosenbergSurgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1201.
Paul F RobbinsSurgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1201; paul_robbins@nih.gov.
Alessandro SetteLa Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA 92037; and.
La Jolla Institute for Immunology · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Adoptive Cell Transfer Immunotherapy of CancerZIABC010984 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2009 to 2025
$56.8M
DNA Sequencing and FACS Core FacilitiesZICBC010948 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROBBINS, PAUL · 2009 to 2025
$35.6M
Building on the success of the adoptive immunotherapy of cancerZIABC010763 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2009 to 2020
$25.0M
Adoptive Cell Transfer Immunotherapy of CancerZ01BC010984 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ROSENBERG, STEVEN · 2008 to 2008
$1.5M
Development of a pipeline tool to predict immunogenicity of cancer neo-epitopesR21AI134127 · NIAID · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI PETERS, BJOERN, SETTE, ALESSANDRO · 2018 to 2019
$495k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010984NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI134127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of MHC-binding prediction tools has been useful in guiding studies aimed at identifying candidate target Ags to generate reactive T cells and to characterize viral and tumor-reactive T cells. Nevertheless, prediction algorithms appear to function poorly for epitopes containing cysteine (Cys) residues, which can oxidize and form disulfide bonds with other Cys residues under oxidizing conditions, thus potentially interfering with their ability to bind to MHC molecules. Analysis of the results of HLA-A*02:01 class I binding assays carried out in the presence and absence of the reducing agent 2-ME indicated that the predicted affinity for 25% of Cys-containing epitopes was underestimated by a factor of 3 or more. Additional analyses were undertaken to evaluate the responses of human CD8

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAntigen PresentationAntigens, NeoplasmCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCells, CulturedCysteineEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHLA-A2 AntigenHumansLymphocyte ActivationNeoplasmsPeptidesProtein BindingReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaT-Cell Antigen Receptor SpecificityAntigens, NeoplasmCysteineEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHLA-A*02:01 antigenHLA-A2 AntigenPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta

Identifiers

PMID32571843
PMCPMC7413297
OpenAlexW3036327081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.