Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571771›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2020

Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care.

Brian MacKenna, Helen J Curtis, Alex J Walker, Richard Croker, Seb Bacon, Ben Goldacre

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Variation in duration of repeat prescriptions: a primary care cohort study in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian MacKennaEBM DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Helen J CurtisEBM DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Alex J WalkerEBM DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Richard CrokerEBM DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Seb BaconEBM DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
Ben GoldacreNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescribing high doses of methotrexate increases the potentially fatal risk of toxicity. To minimise risk, it is recommended that only 2.5 mg tablets are used.

aimTo describe trends in GP prescribing of methotrexate over time; the harm associated with methotrexate errors at a national level; ascertain variation between practices and clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in their implementation of the safety guidance; and map current variations at CCG and practice level. DESIGN AND

settingA retrospective cohort study of English GP prescribing data (August 2010-April 2018), and data acquired via freedom of information (FOI) requests.

methodThe main outcome measures were: variation in ratio of non-adherent/adherent prescribing, geographically and over time, between practices and CCGs; and description of responses to FOI requests.

resultsOf 7349 practices in England, 1689 prescribed both 2.5 mg and 10 mg tablets to individual patients in 2017, breaching national guidance. In April 2018, 697 practices (≥90th percentile) prescribed >14.3% of all methotrexate as 10 mg tablets, likewise breaching national guidance. The 66 practices at ≥99th percentile gave >52.4% of all prescribed methotrexate in the form of 10 mg tablets. The prescribing of 10 mg tablets fell during the study period, with 10 mg tablets as a proportion of all prescribed methotrexate tablets falling from 9.1% to 3.4%. Twenty-one deaths caused by methotrexate poisoning were reported from 1993-2017 in England and Wales.

conclusionThe prevalence of unsafe methotrexate prescribing has reduced but remains common, with substantial variation between practices and CCGs. The authors recommend investment in better strategies around implementation. As 21 deaths that occurred from 1993-2017 in England and Wales were attributed to methotrexate poisoning, the coroners' reports for these deaths should be reviewed to identify recurring themes.

Indexed as

MethotrexateState MedicineCohort StudiesEnglandHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareRetrospective StudiesWalesMethotrexatedrug prescribingepidemiologygeneral practicemethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID32571771
PMCPMC7311108
OpenAlexW3036709596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.