Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571334›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2020

A tale of two cities: the cost, price-differential and affordability of current and healthy diets in Sydney and Canberra, Australia.

Amanda J Lee, Sarah Kane, Lisa-Maree Herron, Misa Matsuyama, Meron Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Food Environment Assessment in Two Socioeconomic Contexts in Queensland, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sustainability and cost of typical and heart-healthy dietary patterns in Australia.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Dietary Intake, Cost, and Affordability by Socioeconomic Group in Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda J LeeSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia. Amanda.Lee@uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6887-5426
Sarah KaneQueensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia.
Lisa-Maree HerronSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Misa MatsuyamaSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.
Meron LewisSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe perception that healthy foods are more expensive than unhealthy foods has been reported widely to be a key barrier to healthy eating. However, assessment of the relative cost of healthy and unhealthy foods and diets is fraught methodologically. Standardised approaches to produce reliable data on the cost of total diets and different dietary patterns, rather than selected foods, are lacking globally to inform policy and practice.

methodsThis paper reports the first application, in randomly selected statistical areas stratified by socio-economic status in two Australian cities, of the Healthy Diets Australian Standardized Affordability and Pricing (ASAP) method protocols: diet pricing tools based on national nutrition survey data and dietary guidelines; store sampling and location; determination of household incomes; food price data collection; and analysis and reporting. The methods were developed by the International Network on Food and Obesity/NCD Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) as a prototype of an optimum approach to assess, compare and monitor the cost and affordability of diets across different geographical and socio-economic settings and times.

resultsUnder current tax policy in Australia, healthy diets would be 15-17% less expensive than current (unhealthy) diets in all locations assessed. Nevertheless, healthy diets are likely to be unaffordable for low income households, costing more than 30% of disposable income in both cities surveyed. Households spent around 58% of their food budget on unhealthy food and drinks. Food costs were on average 4% higher in Canberra than Sydney, and tended to be higher in high socioeconomic locations.

conclusionsHealth and fiscal policy actions to increase affordability of healthy diets for low income households are required urgently. Also, there is a need to counter perceptions that current, unhealthy diets must be less expensive than healthy diets. The Healthy Diets ASAP methods could be adapted to assess the cost and affordability of healthy and unhealthy diets elsewhere.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFoodAustralian Capital TerritoryCosts and Cost AnalysisFood SupplyHumansIncomeNew South WalesNutrition SurveysDiet priceFiscal policyFood affordabilityFood priceINFORMASNutrition policy

Identifiers

PMID32571334
PMCPMC7309977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.