Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571333›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

Plasmodium vivax liver stage assay platforms using Indian clinical isolates.

Pradeep A Subramani, Neha Vartak-Sharma, Seetha Sreekumar, Pallavi Mathur, Bhavana Nayer, Sushrut Dakhore, Sowmya K Basavanna, Devaiah M Kalappa, Ramya V Krishnamurthy, Benudhar Mukhi and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Simian iPS-derived hepatocytes supportFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Basic Research ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Pradeep A SubramaniNational Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS), Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Bellary Road, Bangalore, 560065, India.
Neha Vartak-SharmaInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (inStem), Bangalore, India.
Seetha SreekumarNational Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS), Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Bellary Road, Bangalore, 560065, India.
Pallavi MathurNational Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS), Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Bellary Road, Bangalore, 560065, India.
Bhavana NayerInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (inStem), Bangalore, India.
Sushrut DakhoreInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (inStem), Bangalore, India.
Sowmya K BasavannaICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, India.
Devaiah M KalappaICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, India.
Ramya V KrishnamurthyFoundation for Neglected Disease Research, Bangalore, India.
Benudhar MukhiICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, India.
Priyasha MishraInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (inStem), Bangalore, India.
Noriko YoshidaInstitute for Integrated Cell-Material Sciences (iCeMS), Institute for Advance Studies, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Ushinomiya-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Susanta Kumar GhoshICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), Indian Council of Medical Research, Bangalore, India. ghoshnimr@gmail.com.
Radhakrishan ShandilFoundation for Neglected Disease Research, Bangalore, India.
Shridhar NarayananFoundation for Neglected Disease Research, Bangalore, India.
Brice CampoMedicines for Malaria Venture, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kouichi HasegawaInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine (inStem), Bangalore, India. khasegawa@icems.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Anupkumar R AnvikarICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Neena ValechaICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research (NIMR), Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Varadharajan SundaramurthyNational Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS), Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Bellary Road, Bangalore, 560065, India. varadha@ncbs.res.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2562-8518
Indian Council of Medical Research · INTata Institute of Fundamental Research · INFoundation for Neglected Disease Research · INInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine · INKyoto University · JPManipal Academy of Higher Education · INMedicines for Malaria Venture · CH

Funding

NCBS-TIFR Core support
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVivax malaria is associated with significant morbidity and economic loss, and constitutes the bulk of malaria cases in large parts of Asia and South America as well as recent case reports in Africa. The widespread prevalence of vivax is a challenge to global malaria elimination programmes. Vivax malaria control is particularly challenged by existence of dormant liver stage forms that are difficult to treat and are responsible for multiple relapses, growing drug resistance to the asexual blood stages and host-genetic factors that preclude use of specific drugs like primaquine capable of targeting Plasmodium vivax liver stages. Despite an obligatory liver-stage in the Plasmodium life cycle, both the difficulty in obtaining P. vivax sporozoites and the limited availability of robust host cell models permissive to P. vivax infection are responsible for the limited knowledge of hypnozoite formation biology and relapse mechanisms, as well as the limited capability to do drug screening. Although India accounts for about half of vivax malaria cases world-wide, very little is known about the vivax liver stage forms in the context of Indian clinical isolates.

methodsTo address this, methods were established to obtain infective P. vivax sporozoites from an endemic region in India and multiple assay platforms set up to detect and characterize vivax liver stage forms. Different hepatoma cell lines, including the widely used HCO4 cells, primary human hepatocytes as well as hepatocytes obtained from iPSC's generated from vivax patients and healthy donors were tested for infectivity with P. vivax sporozoites.

resultsBoth large and small forms of vivax liver stage are detected in these assays, although the infectivity obtained in these platforms are low.

conclusionsThis study provides a proof of concept for detecting liver stage P. vivax and provide the first characterization of P. vivax liver stage forms from an endemic region in India.

Indexed as

Life Cycle StagesIndiaLiverMalaria, VivaxPlasmodium vivaxAssay developmentHypnozoiteIndian isolatesInduced pluripotent stem (iPS) cellsMalariaMalaria liver stagePlasmodium vivax

Identifiers

PMID32571333
PMCPMC7310233
OpenAlexW3036689358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.