Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571320›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Evaluation of a midwifery network to guarantee outpatient postpartum care: a mixed methods study.

Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin, Carolina Iglesias, Rebekka Erdin, Jessica Pehlke-Milde

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Clinical Protocol #2: Guidelines for Birth Hospitalization Discharge of Breastfeeding Dyads, Revised 2022.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne Grylka-BaeschlinResearch Unit for Midwifery Science, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Technikumstr. 81, CH-8401, Winterthur, Switzerland. Susanne.Grylka@zhaw.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5652-6886
Carolina IglesiasFamilystart Zurich, Thurgauerstrasse 39, CH-8050, Zurich, Switzerland.
Rebekka ErdinResearch Unit for Midwifery Science, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Technikumstr. 81, CH-8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Jessica Pehlke-MildeResearch Unit for Midwifery Science, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Technikumstr. 81, CH-8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CHZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CH

Funding

Lottery Fund of the Canton of Zurich There is no number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe necessity of outpatient postpartum care has increased due to shorter hospital stays. In a health care system, where postpartum care after hospital discharge must be arranged by families themselves, this can be challenging for those experiencing psychosocial disadvantages. Therefore, we compared characteristics of users of a midwifery network which referred women to outpatient postpartum care providers with those of women organising care themselves. Additionally, we investigated benefits of the network for women and health professionals.

methodsEvaluation of the services of a midwifery network in Switzerland. We combined quantitative secondary analysis of routine data of independent midwives with qualitative telephone interviews with users and a focus group with midwives and nurses. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression modelling were done using Stata 13. Content analysis was applied for qualitative data.

resultsUsers of the network were more likely to be: primiparas (OR 1.52, 95% CI [1.31-1.75, p < 0.001]); of foreign nationality (OR 2.36, 95% CI [2.04-2.73], p < 0.001); without professional education (OR 1.89, 95% CI [1.56-2.29] p < 0.001); unemployed (OR 1.28, 95% CI [1.09-1.51], p = 0.002) and have given birth by caesarean section (OR 1.38, 95% CI [1.20-1.59], p < 0.001) compared to women organising care themselves. Furthermore, users had cumulative risk factors for vulnerable transition into parenthood more often (≥ three risk factors: 4.2% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001). Women appreciate the services provided. The collaboration within the network facilitated work scheduling and the better use of resources for health professionals.

conclusionsThe network enabled midwives and nurses to reach families who might have struggled to organise postpartum care themselves. It also facilitated the work organisation of health professionals. Networks therefore provide benefits for families and health professionals.

Indexed as

Community NetworksAdolescentAdultAmbulatory CareFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services ResearchHumansMiddle AgedMidwiferyPostnatal CarePregnancyQualitative ResearchSwitzerlandYoung AdultMidwiferyNetworkPostpartum carePsychosocially disadvantaged families

Identifiers

PMID32571320
PMCPMC7310082
OpenAlexW3036667400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.