Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571312›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Efficiency and efficacy of planning and care on a post-anesthesia care unit: a retrospective cohort study.

Bart van Tunen, Markus Klimek, Karin Leendertse-Verloop, Robert J Stolker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bart van TunenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. b.vantunen@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2322-5304
Markus KlimekDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Karin Leendertse-VerloopDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Robert J StolkerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the post-anesthesia care unit in our hospital, selected postoperative patients receive care from anesthesiologists and nursing staff if these patients require intensive hemodynamic monitoring or treatment to stabilize vital functions (e.g., vasopressor use and mechanical ventilation support) during a one-night admission. We investigated the agreement between elective preoperative planning for post-anesthesia care unit admission and the postoperative reality, along with the consequences of planning failures.

methodsData from records for 479 consecutive patients from June 1 to November 30, 2014, in a tertiary referral hospital were reviewed and analyzed. All patients admitted to PACU were included, along with patients scheduled to be referred to PACU but ultimately transferred to another ward. The primary outcome was the efficiency of planning PACU admission for elective patients. Secondary outcomes included secondary admissions to PACU or the intensive care unit (ICU) and 30-day morbidity and mortality.

resultsOf the 479 included patients, 342 (71%) were admitted per preoperative planning. Five patients (1%) needed cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and six (1%) did not survive the follow-up period. Patients admitted to PACU because of a shortage of beds in the ICU had the highest readmission (20%) and mortality rates (20%) (P = 0.01).

conclusionsPreoperative planning for PACU admission was off-target for 29%. However, efficient care always takes precedence over efficient planning. In particular, downgrading patients to PACU because of a shortage of beds in the ICU was associated with a mortality increase.

Indexed as

Postoperative CareAgedEfficiency, OrganizationalFemaleHealth PlanningHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecovery RoomRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnesthesia recovery periodManagement of logisticsMortalityPatient safetyPostoperative careQueuing

Identifiers

PMID32571312
PMCPMC7310230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.