Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571301›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

A strategic approach to social accountability: Bwalo forums within the reproductive maternal and child health accountability ecosystem in Malawi.

Nadia Butler, Ginger Johnson, Asiyati Chiweza, Kyaw Myint Aung, John Quinley, Katherine Rogers, Juliet Bedford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nadia ButlerAnthrologica, Woad Mill, Broughton, Oxfordshire, OX15 6AR, UK. nadiabutler@anthrologica.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7907-785X
Ginger JohnsonAnthrologica, Woad Mill, Broughton, Oxfordshire, OX15 6AR, UK.
Asiyati ChiwezaDepartment of Political and Administrative Studies, Chancellor College, University of Malawi, PO Box 280, Zomba, Malawi.
Kyaw Myint AungUNICEF Malawi, PO Box 30375, Airtel Complex Area 40/31, Lilongwe 3, Malawi.
John QuinleyA Promise Renewed Secretariat, UNICEF, 3 United Nations Plaza, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Katherine RogersA Promise Renewed Secretariat, UNICEF, 3 United Nations Plaza, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Juliet BedfordAnthrologica, Woad Mill, Broughton, Oxfordshire, OX15 6AR, UK.
Anthrologica · GBUnited Nations Children's Fund · USUniversity of Malawi · MW

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation No award number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of documented social accountability initiatives to date have been 'tactical' in nature, employing single-tool, mostly community-based approaches. This article provides lessons from a 'strategic', multi-tool, multi-level social accountability project: UNICEF's 'Social Accountability for Every Woman Every Child' intervention in Malawi.

methodsThe project targeted the national, district and community levels. Three Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) were engaged to carry out interventions using various tools to generate evidence and political advocacy at one or more levels. This article focuses on one of the social accountability methods - the bwalo forum (a meeting based on a traditional Malawian method of dialogue). A detailed political economy analysis was conducted by one of the co-authors using qualitative methods including interviews and group discussions. The authors conducted in-country consultations and analysed secondary data provided by the CSOs.

resultsThe political economy analysis highlighted several ways in which CSO partners should modify their work plans to be more compatible with the project context. This included shifting the advocacy and support focus, as well as significantly expanding the bwalo forums. Bwalos were found to be an important platform for allowing citizens to engage with duty bearers at the community and district levels, and enabled a number of reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health issues to be resolved at those levels. The project also enabled learning around participant responses as intermediate project outcomes.

conclusionsThe project utilised various tools to gather data, elevate community voices, and facilitate engagement between citizen and state actors at the community, district and national levels. This provided the scaffolding for numerous issues to be resolved at the community or district levels, or referred to the national level. Bwalo forums were found to be highly effective as a space for inter-level engagement between citizens and state; however, as they were not embedded in existing local structures, their potential for sustainability and scalability was tenuous. A key strength of the project was the political economy analysis, which provided direction for partners to shape their interventions according to local and national realities and be sensitive to the barriers and drivers to positive action.

Indexed as

Child HealthMaternal HealthReproductive HealthSocial ResponsibilityAdolescentChildFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalawiPregnancyCivil society organisationsCommunity meetingsEast AfricaMaternal, newborn and child healthPolitical economy analysisRealist evaluationStrategic social accountabilitySub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID32571301
PMCPMC7310083
OpenAlexW3036281739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.