Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571288›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Palliative care in its own discourse: a focused ethnography of professional messaging in palliative care.

Carla Reigada, Maria Arantzamendi, Carlos Centeno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Perspectives on deprescribing in palliative care.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Palliative Care Professionals' Message to Others: An Ethnographic Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carla ReigadaATLANTES Research Group; Institute for Culture and Society, University of Navarra, Campus Universitario, 31009, Pamplona, Spain. creigada@unav.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3099-0677
Maria ArantzamendiATLANTES Research Group; Institute for Culture and Society, University of Navarra, Campus Universitario, 31009, Pamplona, Spain.
Carlos CentenoATLANTES Research Group; Institute for Culture and Society, University of Navarra, Campus Universitario, 31009, Pamplona, Spain.
Navarre Institute of Health Research · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite 50 years of modern palliative care (PC), a misunderstanding of its purpose persists. The original message that PC is focused on total care, helping to live until the person dies, is being replaced and linked to feelings of fear, anxiety and death, instead of compassion, support or appropriate care. Society is still afraid to speak its name, and specialized units are identified as "places of death" as opposed to "places of life" meant to treat suffering. This issue is prohibitive to the implementation and development of PC policies worldwide. It is imperative to identify what message PC professionals are relaying to patients and other health care specialists and how that message may condition understandings of the right to access PC.

methodsA qualitative study, employing focused ethnography and participant observation (PO) of the daily interaction of PC professionals with patients and family members in three different PC services. Two researchers independently conducted a thematic analysis, followed by member checking with participants.

resultsA total of 242 h of participant observation revealed the following messages sent by PC professionals in their daily interaction with patients and families: i) We are focused on your wellbeing; ii) You matter: we want to get to know you; iii) Your family is important to us.

conclusionThe complexity of PC discourses contributes to the difficulty of identifying a clear universal message between PC professionals, patients and families. The PC professionals observed transmit a simple message focused on their actions rather than their identity, which may perpetuate some social/cultural misunderstandings of PC. It seems there is a common culture, based on the same values and attitudes, within the messages that PC professionals transmit to patients and their families. PC teams are characterised by their availability.

Indexed as

AdultAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareQualitative ResearchSocial IdentificationDaily practiceEthnographyHealth professionalsMessagePalliative carePatient-professional interaction

Identifiers

PMID32571288
PMCPMC7310281
OpenAlexW3036857068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.