Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571279›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Measuring health-related quality of life in elementary and secondary school students using the Chinese version of the EQ-5D-Y in rural China.

Chen-Wei Pan, Hua Zhong, Jun Li, Chen Suo, Pei Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Validation of proxy-reported EQ-5D-Y-3L in younger children with spinal muscular atrophy: age-related differences in performance.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  3. Comparison of the EQ-5D-Y and the CHU-9D instruments in a general child population based on self-reports and proxy-reports.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  4. Evaluating the content validity of the EQ-5D-Y for Chinese children and adolescents.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Understanding Canadian stakeholders' views on measuring and valuing health for children and adolescents: a qualitative study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Testing measurement properties of two EQ-5D youth versions and KIDSCREEN-10 in China.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chen-Wei PanSchool of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Hua ZhongDepartment of Ophthalmology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Jun LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Chen SuoSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, 130 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Pei WangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, 130 Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. Wang_p@fudan.edu.cn.
Fudan University · CNKunming Medical University · CNSecond People's Hospital of Yunnan Province · CNSoochow University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81773449 and 81560169Shanghai Pujiang Program 18PJC016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of elementary and secondary school students in rural China using the simplified Chinese version of the EQ-5D-Y.

methodBoth the samples of students were from a school-based cohort study in a county located in southwestern China. The students self-completed the EQ-5D-Y. Feasibility was evaluated according to the percentages of missing values. Known group validity was assessed by comparing the frequency of reporting EQ-5D-Y problems between groups known to differ in health status.

resultsA total of 1728 elementary students and 2116 secondary students were included in the analysis. Their respective mean age was 8.7 (range: 7-15) years and 14.8 (range: 11-18) years, with girls being 45.1 and 50.1%, respectively. The missing values in both samples were quite low. Elementary students were less likely to have problems on'having pain or discomfort' and 'feeling worried, sad or unhappy' dimensions, but more likely to report problems on the dimensions related to physical functioning. Gender difference in HRQOL was only detected for secondary students in terms of 'doing usual activities', 'having pain or discomfort,' and 'feeling worried, sad or unhappy' (P < 0.05 for all). The significant differences in HRQOL were not observed for the other characteristics.

conclusionsIt appears that the EQ-5D-Y is feasible and valid instrument in school-aged children and adolescents in rural China; but it suffers from similar disadvantages to those found in other general populations. The HRQOL distributions measured by the EQ-5D-Y were also provided.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeAdolescentChildChinaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthReproducibility of ResultsRural PopulationSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesChinaEQ-5D-YHealth-related quality of liferural

Identifiers

PMID32571279
PMCPMC7310053
OpenAlexW3036907521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.