Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571271›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Multi-level validation of the German physical activity self-efficacy scale in a sample of female sixth-graders.

Joachim Bachner, David J Sturm, Stephan Haug, Yolanda Demetriou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The diagnostic value and associated molecular mechanism study for fibroblast-related mitochondrial genes on keloid.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A biomarker and molecular mechanism investigation for thyroid cancer.Central-European journal of immunology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joachim BachnerDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany. joachim.bachner@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8942-3055
David J SturmDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.
Stephan HaugDepartment of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 3, 85748, Garching, Germany.
Yolanda DemetriouDepartment of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DE 2680/3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of children and adolescents are insufficiently physically active. Self-efficacy is considered one of the most important determinants of physical activity (PA). The purpose of this study was to validate the German version of the physical activity self-efficacy scale by means of a multi-level approach. Factorial validity, internal consistency and criterion validity were examined for the individual and the class level.

methodsThe final sample comprised 454 female sixth-graders of 33 classes. To examine the factorial validity of the translated 8-item scale, a multi-level confirmatory factor analysis was conducted with the lavaan package in R. Internal consistency was estimated with the alpha function of the psych package. Criterion validity was examined by correlating self-efficacy with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) assessed with accelerometers.

resultsIn contrast to previous validation studies, a unidimensional structure of the scale was not supported. Instead, two highly correlated (r

conclusionsThe validation speaks for the use of the abridged 6-item scale, which allows for a unidimensional assessment of PA self-efficacy. Generally, the results support the relevance of a multi-level approach, which not only differentiates between self-efficacy on the individual level and on the class level but also between the respective implications regarding reliability and criterion validity on both levels. Thereby, this study offers a rigorously validated scale and further illustrates possible consequences of the usual neglect of group-level variance in scale validation.

Indexed as

Self EfficacyChildExerciseFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFriendsHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingAdolescentsConfirmatory factor analysisCriterion validityInternal consistencyLavaanMulti-level

Identifiers

PMID32571271
PMCPMC7310132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.