Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571245›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Diagnosis of triple negative breast cancer based on radiomics signatures extracted from preoperative contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography.

Qingliang Feng, Qiang Hu, Yan Liu, Tao Yang, Ziyi Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Assessment of CuFeSeNano convergence · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The role of FDG PET/CT radiomics in the prediction of pathological response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with esophageal cancer.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Predictive Value ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qingliang FengDepartment of Radiology, Linyi Central Hospital, Linyi, China.
Qiang HuDepartment of Radiology, Linyi Central Hospital, Linyi, China.
Yan LiuDepartment of Healthcare, Linyi Central Hospital, Linyi, China.
Tao YangDepartment of Radiology, Linyi Central Hospital, Linyi, China.
Ziyi YinDepartment of Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 119 South 4th Ring West Road, Beijing, 100070, China. a22121332@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1720-1418

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore the diagnostic value of radiomics features of preoperative computed tomography (CT) for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) for better treatment of patients with breast cancer.

methodsA total of 890 patients with breast cancer admitted to our hospital from June 2016 to January 2018 were analyzed. They were diagnosed by surgery and pathology to have mass and invasive breast cancer and had contrast-enhanced chest CT examination before operation. 300 patients were randomly selected for the study, including 100 TNBC and 200 non-TNBC (NTNBC) patients. Among them 180 were used in discovery group and 120 were used in validation group. The molecular subtypes of breast cancer in the patients were determined immunohistochemistrially. Radiomics features were extracted from three dimensional CT-images. The LASSO logistic method was used to select image features and calculate radiomics scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of radiomics scores for TNBC.

resultsFive image features were found to be related to TNBC subtype (P < 0.001). These image features based-radiomic signatures had good predictive values for TNBC with the areas under ROC curve (AUC) of 0.881 (95% CI: 0.781-0.921) in the discovery group and 0.851 (95% CI: 0.761-0.961) in the validation group, respectively. The sensitivities and specificities were 0.767, and 0.873 in the discovery group and 0.785 and 0.915 in the validation group.

conclusionsRadiomic signature based on preoperative CT is capable of distinguishing patients with TNBC and NTNBC. It adds additional value for conventional chest contrast-enhanced CT and helps plan the strategy for clinical treatment of the patients.

Indexed as

Radiography, ThoracicAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRadiographic Image EnhancementRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsContrast MediaBreast cancerComputed tomographyMolecular subtypePredictionRadiomicsTriple negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID32571245
PMCPMC7309976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.