Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32571230›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

What is the level of uptake of partner notification services in HIV testing in selected health facilities in Gatanga Sub County, Muranga County - Kenya; a retrospective study.

Rewel Mwangi Kariuki, Gilbert Koome Rithaa, Elvis Omondi Oyugi, Daniel Muya Gachathi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rewel Mwangi KariukiDepartment of Health, Murang'a County Government, P O Box 69, Muranga, 10200, Kenya. kariukirewel@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2351-3533
Gilbert Koome RithaaCollege of Health Sciences, Mount Kenya University, P O Box 342, Thika, 01000, Kenya.
Elvis Omondi OyugiField Epidemiology & Laboratory Training Program (FELTP)-Kenya, P. O Box 30016, Nairobi, Kenya.
Daniel Muya GachathiDepartment of Health, Murang'a County Government, P O Box 69, Muranga, 10200, Kenya.
Murang'a University of Technology · KEKenya Medical Training College · KEMount Kenya University · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of people living with HIV is key in HIV prevention and control. Partner Notification service is a World Health Organization backed strategy of reaching out to sexual partners of people diagnosed with HIV for HIV testing. However, its adoption and success rate in Kenya remains unknown.

methodsA cross sectional facility based study was undertaken in five purposely selected health facilities in Gatanga Sub county, Muranga County, Kenya. A retrospective review of patient medical records data for HIV positive index clients and their Sexual Partners conducted. Census approach was applied to extract data for study subjects from Partner Notification Services registers for the period covering January 2017 to August 2018. Epi Info software was used for data analysis.

resultsA total of 183 index clients were offered Partner notification services. The mean age of the indexed clients studied was 39(SD ±13.1). Females comprised 64% of clients studied. Of the 183 indexed clients, 89% accepted the services and elicited 216 sexual partners for tracing. The ratio of elicited sexual partners to index client was 1.3:1. Out of the 216 sexual partners, 77% were reached and tested. A total of 46 [32%] of the sexual partners elicited and traced, tested HIV positive. The most preferred approaches were provider referral (51%) and contract referral (45%). Dual referral (4%) was the least preferred approach.

conclusionsAssisted Partner notification services is acceptable and an effective strategy of increasing HIV case identification and raising awareness to exposed sexual partners in low resource countries.

Indexed as

Sexual PartnersAdultContact TracingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth FacilitiesHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultContactHIVKenyaPartner notification services

Identifiers

PMID32571230
PMCPMC7310157
OpenAlexW3036333551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.