ArticleOphthalmic genetics2020
Content generation for patient-reported outcome measures for retinal degeneration therapeutic trials.
Article in Ophthalmic genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing Challenges in Developing Treatments for Inherited Retinal Diseases: Recommendations From the Third Monaciano Symposium.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Review
- Inherited Retinal Degenerations and Non-Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Progress and Unmet Needs.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Review
- Update on Clinical Trial Endpoints in Gene Therapy Trials for Inherited Retinal Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Emotional State Evaluation of Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients with the Beck Depression Inventory.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Self-Reported Functional Vision in USH2A-Associated Retinal Degeneration as Measured by the Michigan Retinal Degeneration Questionnaire.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Observational
- Beyond the NEI-VFQ: Recent Experience in the Development and Utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Inherited Retinal Diseases.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023Review
- The Michigan Vision-Related Anxiety Questionnaire: A Psychosocial Outcomes Measure for Inherited Retinal Degenerations.American journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- The Michigan Retinal Degeneration Questionnaire: A Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Inherited Retinal Degenerations.American journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeGenerate content for a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for use in future clinical trials for inherited retinal degenerations.
methodsPatients at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center with a clinical diagnosis of inherited retinal degeneration with varying phenotypes were recruited for interviews. First, in-depth interviews were performed to solicit a wide range of patient experiences pertaining to visual function. Coders qualitatively analyzed the transcripts from these interviews using Atlas.ti software (Version 8.1.3 (522)) to draft questionnaire items. Next, the questionnaire was tested and refined based on participant feedback in cognitive interviews and administrator feedback in the pilot survey administration (pilot interviews).
resultsA total of 55 participants with a clinical diagnosis of inherited retinal degeneration were interviewed throughout the three study phases: in-depth interviews (n = 26), cognitive interviews (n = 16), and pilot interviews (n = 13). Coded items were analyzed for frequency of occurrence and related themes, then organized into common domains. Within each domain, PRO items were drafted to address the functional limitations or adaptations experienced by patients.
conclusionsItems for a PRO measure have been drafted and evaluated for interpretability in the target inherited retinal degeneration patient population. Content validity for the items was established through a process of in-depth interviews, cognitive interviews, and pilot interviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.