ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Comparison between Statistical Models and Machine Learning Methods on Classification for Highly Imbalanced Multiclass Kidney Data.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in predicting chronic kidney disease prognosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Renal failure · 2024Pooled it
- Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review.Journal of nephrology · 2023Pooled it
- Leveraging time-series electronic health records with large language models for chronic kidney disease diagnosis in primary care.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Hierarchical contrastive learning from GP-recorded and eGFR labels for CKD staging.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Enhancing Model Generalizability in Medical Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Comparison of Categorical Encoding and Sampling Techniques for Imbalanced Data.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Recent advances in the tools and techniques for AI-aided diagnosis of atrial fibrillation.Biophysics reviews · 2025Review
- Variational quantum classifier-based early identification and classification of chronic kidney disease using sparse autoencoder and LASSO shrinkage.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Development of risk models for early detection and prediction of chronic kidney disease in clinical settings.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Analyzing Longitudinal Health Screening Data with Feature Ensemble and Machine Learning Techniques: Investigating Diagnostic Risk Factors of Metabolic Syndrome for Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3a to 3b.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Models to Predict Future Frailty in Community-Dwelling Middle-Aged and Older Adults: The ELSA Cohort Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023Article
- A Powerful Paradigm for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification Using Multiclass, Multi-Label, and Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Paradigms: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Construction of genetic classification model for coronary atherosclerosis heart disease using three machine learning methods.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- Automated Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease by Capturing Impairments in Multiple Cognitive Domains with Multiple Drawing Tasks.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Article
- Performance Analysis of Conventional Machine Learning Algorithms for Identification of Chronic Kidney Disease in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Multiclass machine learning vs. conventional calculators for stroke/CVD risk assessment using carotid plaque predictors with coronary angiography scores as gold standard: a 500 participants study.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Article
- Identification of Immune-Related Biomarkers for Sciatica in Peripheral Blood.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Potential of Immune-Related Genes as Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Subtype Classification of Preeclampsia.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to compare the classification performance of statistical models on highly imbalanced kidney data. The health examination cohort database provided by the National Health Insurance Service in Korea is utilized to build models with various machine learning methods. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is used to diagnose chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease method and classified into five stages (1, 2, 3A and 3B, 4, and 5). Different CKD stages based on the estimated GFR are considered as six classes of the response variable. This study utilizes two representative generalized linear models for classification, namely, multinomial logistic regression (multinomial LR) and ordinal logistic regression (ordinal LR), as well as two machine learning models, namely, random forest (RF) and autoencoder (AE). The classification performance of the four models is compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-Measure. To find the best model that classifies CKD stages correctly, the data are divided into a 10-fold dataset with the same rate for each CKD stage. Results indicate that RF and AE show better performance in accuracy than the multinomial and ordinal LR models when classifying the response variable. However, when a highly imbalanced dataset is modeled, the accuracy of the model performance can distort the actual performance. This occurs because accuracy is high even if a statistical model classifies a minority class into a majority class. To solve this problem in performance interpretation, we not only consider accuracy from the confusion matrix but also sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F-1 measure for each class. To present classification performance with a single value for each model, we calculate the macro-average and micro-weighted values for each model. We conclude that AE is the best model classifying CKD stages correctly for all performance indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.