Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32570718›Full record

ArticleToxins2020

Venomics Approach Reveals a High Proportion of

John P Dunbar, Antoine Fort, Damien Redureau, Ronan Sulpice, Michel M Dugon, Loïc Quinton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Organ-resolved lipid mapping inFrontiers in chemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Inhibition of bacterial biofilms by the snake venom proteome.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. De Novo Transcriptome Analysis of the Venom ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  9. Widow spiders in the New World: a review onThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

John P DunbarVenom Systems & Proteomics Lab, School of Natural Sciences, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland.
Antoine FortPlant Systems Biology Lab, Plant and AgriBiosciences Research Centre, School of Natural Sciences, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2210-7234
Damien RedureauMass Spectrometry Laboratory, MolSys RU, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Ronan SulpicePlant Systems Biology Lab, Plant and AgriBiosciences Research Centre, School of Natural Sciences, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland.
Michel M DugonVenom Systems & Proteomics Lab, School of Natural Sciences, Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland.
Loïc QuintonMass Spectrometry Laboratory, MolSys RU, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8153-9590
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The noble false widow spider

Indexed as

ProteomicsSpidersAnimalsArthropod ProteinsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingNeurotoxinsSpider VenomsArthropod ProteinsNeurotoxinsSpider Venomsenvenomationmass spectrometrynecrosisneurotoxinsSteatoda nobilistoxinstranscriptomicsvenomvenomicsα-latrotoxin

Identifiers

PMID32570718
PMCPMC7354476
OpenAlexW3036702134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.