Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32569591›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of medicine2020

Persistent Value of the Stethoscope in the Age of COVID-19.

Rajiv S Vasudevan, Yu Horiuchi, Francesca J Torriani, Bruno Cotter, Sofie M Maisel, Sanjeet S Dadwal, Robert Gaynes, Alan S Maisel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Could the stethoscope be a SARS-CoV-2 vector?Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Could the stethoscope be a SARS-CoV-2 vector?Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Recent Advances in Wearable Sensing Technologies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rajiv S VasudevanDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla. Electronic address: rvasudev@health.ucsd.edu.
Yu HoriuchiDivision of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Francesca J TorrianiDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla; Division of Infectious Diseases.
Bruno CotterDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla.
Sofie M MaiselUniversity of California Berkeley.
Sanjeet S DadwalDivision of Infectious Diseases, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, Calif.
Robert GaynesDivision of Infectious Diseases, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga.
Alan S MaiselDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stethoscope has long been at the center of patient care, as well as a symbol of the physician-patient relationship. While advancements in other diagnostic modalities have allowed for more efficient and accurate diagnosis, the stethoscope has evolved in parallel to address the needs of the modern era of medicine. These advancements include sound visualization, ambient noise reduction/cancellation, Bluetooth (Bluetooth SIG Inc, Kirkland, Wash) transmission, and computer algorithm diagnostic support. However, despite these advancements, the ever-changing climate of infection prevention, especially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, has led many to question the stethoscope as a vector for infectious diseases. Stethoscopes have been reported to harbor bacteria with contamination levels comparable with a physician's hand. Although disinfection is recommended, stethoscope hygiene compliance remains low. In addition, disinfectants may not be completely effective in eliminating microorganisms. Despite these risks, the growing technological integration with the stethoscope continues to make it a highly valuable tool. Rather than casting our valuable tool and symbol of medicine aside, we must create and implement an effective method of stethoscope hygiene to keep patients safe.

Indexed as

StethoscopesBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19HumansHygienePandemicsPhysician-Patient RelationsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2AdvancementCOVID-19Stethoscope

Identifiers

PMID32569591
PMCPMC7303610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.