ArticleBlood advances2020
Ex vivo drug screening defines novel drug sensitivity patterns for informing personalized therapy in myeloid neoplasms.
Article in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Enigmatic Tumor Suppressor p53 Biomolecule: Its Role and Prognostic and Predictive Values in Cancer Therapy and Precision Medicine.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- DDX41-Mutated AML: A Case Report and Perspectives.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Image-based drug screening combined with molecular profiling identifies signatures and drivers of therapy resistance in pediatric AML.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative small molecule screening of primary human acute leukemias, engineered human leukemia and leukemia cell lines.Leukemia · 2025Article
- Lymphoma and Leukemia Cell Vulnerabilities and Resistance Identified by Compound Library Screens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Decoding Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Clinician's Guide to Functional Profiling.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- A Combinatorial Functional Precision Medicine Platform for Rapid Therapeutic Response Prediction in AML.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Single-cell landscape of innate and acquired drug resistance in acute myeloid leukemia.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Single-cell transcriptomes identify patient-tailored therapies for selective co-inhibition of cancer clones.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Integrated drug profiling and CRISPR screening identify BCR::ABL1-independent vulnerabilities in chronic myeloid leukemia.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical forecasting of acute myeloid leukemia using ex vivo drug-sensitivity profiling.Cell reports methods · 2023Article
- Tretinoin Enhances the Effects of Chemotherapy in Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia Using an Ex Vivo Drug Sensitivity Assay.JCO precision oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- Early response evaluation by single cell signaling profiling in acute myeloid leukemia.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Cancer: slaying the nine-headed Hydra.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2023Review
- Sensitivity of canine hematological cancers to BH3 mimetics.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2023Article
- Ex Vivo Drug Sensitivity Correlates with Clinical Response and Supports Personalized Therapy in Pediatric AML.Cancers · 2022Article
- A pipeline for malignancy and therapy agnostic assessment of cancer drug response using cell mass measurements.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Application of High Throughput Technologies in the Development of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy: Challenges and Progress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Implementing a Functional Precision Medicine Tumor Board for Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cancer discovery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision medicine approaches such as ex vivo drug sensitivity screening (DSS) are appealing to inform rational drug selection in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) and acute myeloid leukemia, given their marked biologic heterogeneity. We evaluated a novel, fully automated ex vivo DSS platform that uses high-throughput flow cytometry in 54 patients with newly diagnosed or treatment-refractory myeloid neoplasms to evaluate sensitivity (blast cytotoxicity and differentiation) to 74 US Food and Drug Administration-approved or investigational drugs and 36 drug combinations. After piloting the platform in 33 patients, we conducted a prospective feasibility study enrolling 21 patients refractory to hypomethylating agents (HMAs) to determine whether this assay could be performed within a clinically actionable time frame and could accurately predict clinical responses in vivo. When assayed for cytotoxicity, ex vivo drug sensitivity patterns were heterogeneous, but they defined distinct patient clusters with differential sensitivity to HMAs, anthracyclines, histone deacetylase inhibitors, and kinase inhibitors (P < .001 among clusters) and demonstrated synergy between HMAs and venetoclax (P < .01 for combinations vs single agents). In our feasibility study, ex vivo DSS results were available at a median of 15 days after bone marrow biopsy, and they informed personalized therapy, which frequently included venetoclax combinations, kinase inhibitors, differentiative agents, and androgens. In 21 patients with available ex vivo and in vivo clinical response data, the DSS platform had a positive predictive value of 0.92, negative predictive value of 0.82, and overall accuracy of 0.85. These data demonstrate the utility of this approach for identifying potentially useful and often novel therapeutic drugs for patients with myeloid neoplasms refractory to standard therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.