Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32569336›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Anthropometric indices and cut-off points in the diagnosis of metabolic disorders.

Stanisław Głuszek, Elzbieta Ciesla, Martyna Głuszek-Osuch, Dorota Kozieł, Wojciech Kiebzak, Łukasz Wypchło, Edyta Suliga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A New Approach Using BMI and FMI as Predictors of Cardio-Vascular Risk Factors among Mexican Young Adults.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stanisław GłuszekInstitute of Medical Sciences, Medical College, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7752-0459
Elzbieta CieslaInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Martyna Głuszek-OsuchInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Dorota KoziełInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Wojciech KiebzakInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Łukasz WypchłoInstitute of Medical Sciences, Medical College, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.
Edyta SuligaInstitute of Health Sciences, Medical College, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3063-0380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIdentifying metabolic disorders at the earliest phase of their development allows for an early intervention and the prevention of serious consequences of diseases. However, it is difficult to determine which of the anthropometric indices of obesity is the best tool for diagnosing metabolic disorders. The aims of this study were to evaluate the usefulness of selected anthropometric indices and to determine optimal cut-off points for the identification of single metabolic disorders that are components of metabolic syndrome (MetS).

designCross-sectional study.

participantsWe analyzed the data of 12,328 participants aged 55.7±5.4 years. All participants were of European descent. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Four MetS components were included: high glucose concentration, high blood triglyceride concentration, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration, and elevated blood pressure. The following obesity indices were considered: waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), body fat percentage (%BF), Clínica Universidad de Navarra-body adiposity estimator (CUN-BAE), body roundness index (BRI), and a body shape index (ABSI).

resultsThe following indices had the highest discriminatory power for the identification of at least one MetS component: CUN-BAE, BMI, and WC in men (AUC = 0.734, 0.728, and 0.728, respectively) and WHtR, CUN-BAE, and WC in women (AUC = 0.715, 0.714, and 0.712, respectively) (p<0.001 for all). The other indices were similarly useful, except for the ABSI.

conclusionsFor the BMI, the optimal cut-off point for the identification of metabolic abnormalities was 27.2 kg/m2 for both sexes. For the WC, the optimal cut-off point was of 94 cm for men and 87 cm for women. Prospective studies are needed to identify those indices in which changes in value predict the occurrence of metabolic disorders best.

Indexed as

AnthropometryArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMaleMetabolic DiseasesMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32569336
PMCPMC7307766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.