ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Classifying sex and strain from mouse ultrasonic vocalizations using deep learning.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Activity-dependent development of vocal circuits in the neonatal rodent forebrain.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Social familiarity strengthens neural and vocal responses to conspecific calls in zebra finches.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Decoding Poultry Welfare from Sound-A Machine Learning Framework for Non-Invasive Acoustic Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rates of female mouse ultrasonic vocalizations are low and are not modulated by estrous state during interactions with muted males.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Demographic identification of Greater Caribbean manatees via acoustic feature learning.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Article
- Who is calling? Optimizing source identification from marmoset vocalizations with hierarchical machine learning classifiers.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- Cortical circuits modulate mouse social vocalizations.Science advances · 2023Article
- Predictive Mouse Ultrasonic Vocalization Sequences: Uncovering Behavioral Significance, Auditory Cortex Neuronal Preferences, and Social-Experience-Driven Plasticity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Rodent ultrasonic vocal interaction resolved with millimeter precision using hybrid beamforming.eLife · 2023Article
- Improving the workflow to crack Small, Unbalanced, Noisy, but Genuine (SUNG) datasets in bioacoustics: The case of bonobo calls.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- High-precision spatial analysis of mouse courtship vocalization behavior reveals sex and strain differences.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Attraction of female house mice to male ultrasonic courtship vocalizations depends on their social experience and estrous stage.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Beyond the three-chamber test: toward a multimodal and objective assessment of social behavior in rodents.Molecular autism · 2022Review
- Ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory mice: strain, age, and sex differences.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2022Article
- Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Adult C57BL/6J Mice: The Role of Sex Differences and Repeated Testing.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Review
- Article
- Low-dimensional learned feature spaces quantify individual and group differences in vocal repertoires.eLife · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vocalizations are widely used for communication between animals. Mice use a large repertoire of ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in different social contexts. During social interaction recognizing the partner's sex is important, however, previous research remained inconclusive whether individual USVs contain this information. Using deep neural networks (DNNs) to classify the sex of the emitting mouse from the spectrogram we obtain unprecedented performance (77%, vs. SVM: 56%, Regression: 51%). Performance was even higher (85%) if the DNN could also use each mouse's individual properties during training, which may, however, be of limited practical value. Splitting estimation into two DNNs and using 24 extracted features per USV, spectrogram-to-features and features-to-sex (60%) failed to reach single-step performance. Extending the features by each USVs spectral line, frequency and time marginal in a semi-convolutional DNN resulted in a performance mid-way (64%). Analyzing the network structure suggests an increase in sparsity of activation and correlation with sex, specifically in the fully-connected layers. A detailed analysis of the USV structure, reveals a subset of male vocalizations characterized by a few acoustic features, while the majority of sex differences appear to rely on a complex combination of many features. The same network architecture was also able to achieve above-chance classification for cortexless mice, which were considered indistinguishable before. In summary, spectrotemporal differences between male and female USVs allow at least their partial classification, which enables sexual recognition between mice and automated attribution of USVs during analysis of social interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.