Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32569276›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Modeling mosquito-borne and sexual transmission of Zika virus in an enzootic host, the African green monkey.

Andrew D Haddow, Unai Perez-Sautu, Michael R Wiley, Lynn J Miller, Adrienne E Kimmel, Lucia M Principe, Suzanne E Wollen-Roberts, Joshua D Shamblin, Stephanie M Valdez, Lisa H Cazares and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Zika Virus Neuropathogenesis-Research and Understanding.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew D HaddowVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8957-2608
Unai Perez-SautuCenter for Genome Sciences, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8587-7001
Michael R WileyCenter for Genome Sciences, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Lynn J MillerVeterinary Medicine Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Adrienne E KimmelVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2977-1434
Lucia M PrincipeVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Suzanne E Wollen-RobertsVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9409-2756
Joshua D ShamblinVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Stephanie M ValdezVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2039-1825
Lisa H CazaresMolecular and Translational Sciences Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
William D PrattVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Franco D RossiAerobiology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Luis Lugo-RomanVeterinary Medicine Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Sina BavariMolecular and Translational Sciences Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Gustavo F PalaciosCenter for Genome Sciences, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Aysegul NalcaAerobiology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Farooq NasarVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
M Louise M PittVirology Division, United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquito-borne and sexual transmission of Zika virus (ZIKV), a TORCH pathogen, recently initiated a series of large epidemics throughout the Tropics. Animal models are necessary to determine transmission risk and study pathogenesis, as well screen antivirals and vaccine candidates. In this study, we modeled mosquito and sexual transmission of ZIKV in the African green monkey (AGM). Following subcutaneous, intravaginal or intrarectal inoculation of AGMs with ZIKV, we determined the transmission potential and infection dynamics of the virus. AGMs inoculated by all three transmission routes exhibited viremia and viral shedding followed by strong virus neutralizing antibody responses, in the absence of clinical illness. All four of the subcutaneously inoculated AGMs became infected (mean peak viremia: 2.9 log10 PFU/mL, mean duration: 4.3 days) and vRNA was detected in their oral swabs, with infectious virus being detected in a subset of these specimens. Although all four of the intravaginally inoculated AGMs developed virus neutralizing antibody responses, only three had detectable viremia (mean peak viremia: 4.0 log10 PFU/mL, mean duration: 3.0 days). These three AGMs also had vRNA and infectious virus detected in both oral and vaginal swabs. Two of the four intrarectally inoculated AGMs became infected (mean peak viremia: 3.8 log10 PFU/mL, mean duration: 3.5 days). vRNA was detected in oral swabs collected from both of these infected AGMs, and infectious virus was detected in an oral swab from one of these AGMs. Notably, vRNA and infectious virus were detected in vaginal swabs collected from the infected female AGM (peak viral load: 7.5 log10 copies/mL, peak titer: 3.8 log10 PFU/mL, range of detection: 5-21 days post infection). Abnormal clinical chemistry and hematology results were detected and acute lymphadenopathy was observed in some AGMs. Infection dynamics in all three AGM ZIKV models are similar to those reported in the majority of human ZIKV infections. Our results indicate that the AGM can be used as a surrogate to model mosquito or sexual ZIKV transmission and infection. Furthermore, our results suggest that AGMs are likely involved in the enzootic maintenance and amplification cycle of ZIKV.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalDisease Transmission, InfectiousAnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsCulicidaeFemaleMaleSexually Transmitted Diseases, ViralVector Borne DiseasesZika Virus Infection

Identifiers

PMID32569276
PMCPMC7343349
OpenAlexW3036187228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.