Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32569275›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Efficacy and safety of single-dose 40 mg/kg oral praziquantel in the treatment of schistosomiasis in preschool-age versus school-age children: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

Piero L Olliaro, Jean T Coulibaly, Amadou Garba, Christine Halleux, Jennifer Keiser, Charles H King, Francisca Mutapi, Eliézer K N'Goran, Giovanna Raso, Alexandra U Scherrer and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reconciling Egg- and Antigen-Based Estimates of Schistosoma mansoni Clearance and Reinfection: A Modeling Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Transmission Dynamics ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Piero L OlliaroCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jean T CoulibalySwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Amadou GarbaDepartment of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christine HalleuxUNICEF/UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jennifer KeiserSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Charles H KingCenter for Global Health and Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America.
Francisca MutapiNIHR Global Health Research Unit Tackling Infections to Benefit Africa (TIBA), Ashworth Laboratories, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Eliézer K N'GoranUnité de Formation et de Recherche Biosciences, Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Giovanna RasoSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexandra U ScherrerDivision of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
José Carlos Sousa-FigueiredoDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Wolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratories, London, United Kingdom.
Katarina SteteDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Jürg UtzingerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Michel T VaillantCentre of Competences for Methodology and Statistics, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-4714-8128
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHWorld Health Organization · CHCentre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution · GBLuxembourg Institute of Health · LUNatural History Museum · GBSwiss Centre for Scientific Research · CIUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Georgia · USUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Department of Health 16/136/33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetter knowledge of the efficacy and safety of single-dose 40 mg/kg oral praziquantel in preschool-age children is required, should preventive chemotherapy programs for schistosomiasis be expanded to include this age group. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed individual participant-level data from 16 studies (13 single-arm or cohort studies and three randomized trials), amounting to 683 preschool-age children (aged <6 years) and 2,010 school-age children (aged 6-14 years). Children had a documented Schistosoma mansoni or S. haematobium infection, were treated with single 40 mg/kg oral praziquantel, and assessed between 21 and 60 days post-treatment. Efficacy was expressed as arithmetic mean and individual egg reduction rate (ERR) and meta-analyzed using general linear models and mixed models. Safety was summarized using reported adverse events (AEs). PRINCIPAL

findingsPreschool-age children had significantly lower baseline Schistosoma egg counts and more losses to follow-up compared to school-age children. No difference in efficacy was found between preschool- and school-age children using a general linear model of individual-participant ERR with baseline log-transformed egg count as covariate and study, age, and sex as fixed variables, and a mixed model with a random effect on the study. Safety was reported in only four studies (n = 1,128 individuals); few AEs were reported in preschool-age children 4 and 24 hours post-treatment as well as at follow-up. Three severe but not serious AEs were recorded in school-age children during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: There is no indication that single-dose 40 mg/kg oral praziquantel would be less efficacious and less safe in preschool-age children compared to school-age children, with the caveat that only few randomized comparisons exist between the two age groups. Preventive chemotherapy might therefore be extended to preschool-age children, with proper monitoring of its efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAnimalsAnthelminticsChemopreventionChildChild, PreschoolFecesFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleParasite Egg CountPraziquantelRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchistosoma haematobiumAnthelminticsPraziquantel

Identifiers

PMID32569275
PMCPMC7360067
OpenAlexW3036147749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.