Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32569207›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2020

Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia improves survival compared to desflurane anesthesia in gastric cancer surgery: A retrospective analysis.

Nian-Cih Huang, Meei-Shyuan Lee, Hou-Chuan Lai, Han-Ting Lin, Yi-Hsuan Huang, Chueng-He Lu, Chen-Heng Hsu, Zhi-Fu Wu

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nian-Cih HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0003-0353-0579
Meei-Shyuan LeeSchool of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Hou-Chuan LaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center.
Han-Ting LinSchool of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yi-Hsuan HuangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center.
Chueng-He LuSchool of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chen-Heng HsuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Zhi-Fu WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical management of cancer may induce stress and increase the likelihood of cancer metastasis and recurrence. Appropriate surgical and anesthetic techniques may affect the patient's outcome. Although numerous studies have been performed, conflicting results have been obtained regarding the effect of anesthetic techniques on the outcome of patients with cancer. We conducted this study to evaluate the association of anesthetic techniques with overall and recurrence-free survival in patients who had undergone gastric cancer surgery.This retrospective study reviewed the electronic medical records of patients, who had visited our hospital and had been diagnosed with gastric cancer between July 1st, 2006 to June 30th, 2016. Univariate analysis of the potential prognostic factors was performed using the log-rank test for categorical factors, and parameters with a P-value < .05 at the univariate step were included in the multivariate regression analysis. Propensity Score Matching was performed to account for differences in baseline characteristics: propofol or desflurane, in a 1:1 ratio.A total of 408 patients anesthetized with desflurane (218) and propofol (190) were eligible for analysis. After propensity matching, 167 patients remained in each group. The overall mortality rate was significantly higher in the desflurane group (56%) than in the propofol group (34%) during follow-up (P < .001). In addition, a greater percentage of patients in the desflurane group (41%) exhibited postoperative metastasis than those in the propofol group (19%, P < .001).The authors found some association between types of anesthesia used and the long-term prognosis of gastric cancer. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia improved survival and reduced the risk of recurrence and metastasis during the 5-year follow-up period after gastric cancer surgery.

Indexed as

AgedAnesthesia, IntravenousAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousDesfluraneFemaleHumansMalePropensity ScorePropofolRetrospective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsSurvival RateAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousDesfluranePropofol

Identifiers

PMID32569207
PMCPMC7310978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.