Glucocorticoid versus traditional therapy for hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

objectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of glucocorticoid versus traditional therapy for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF).

methodsPubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and EMBASE were searched. All clinical studies, including randomized controlled studies and cohort studies, comparing glucocorticoids with traditional treatments (until November 1, 2018), were included.

resultsA total of 3 randomized controlled trials and 5 cohort studies (including 3 retrospective cohort studies), involving 538 patients, were subjected to the meta-analysis. The total bilirubin levels before treatment were not significantly different (odds ratio [OR]: -0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.56 to 0.62; P = .23), and, however, they were significantly reduced after treatment in the corticosteroid group compared with the traditional treatment group (OR: -8.83; 95% CI: -14.99 to 2.67; P = .005). Moreover, prothrombin time was significantly long before treatment in either group, with no significant differences (OR: 0.28; 95% CI: -0.79 to 1.34; P = 0.61). However, after treatment, prothrombin time was significantly shortened in the traditional treatment group (OR: 31.71; 95% CI: 3.62-59.81; P = .03). Furthermore, inpatient mortality (OR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.08-0.67; P = .007) and ascites events (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.18-0.67; P = .90) were significantly lower in the corticosteroid treatment group.

conclusionsGlucocorticoid is more effective for reducing the T-bili level, significantly decreasing in-hospital mortality and ascites events in HBV-related ACLF patients. Moreover, bilirubin may play a pivotal role in the early stage of HBV-related ACLF progression to advanced liver failure.