Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32569011›Full record

ArticleInvestigative radiology2020

Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Imaging of Tumor Vasculature With Positively Charged Microbubbles.

Galina B Diakova, Zhongmin Du, Alexander L Klibanov

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Galina B DiakovaFrom the Robert M Berne Cardiovascular Research Center.
Zhongmin DuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering.
Alexander L KlibanovCardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Robert M Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, Department of Radiology, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Cardiovascular Research Center · BR

Funding

Ultrasound-triggered red blood cell drug delivery with photoacoustic trackingR01EB023055 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KLIBANOV, ALEXANDER L · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
Ultrasound Enhanced Low Dose Drug Delivery: Quantifying Uptake, Retention and BiodistributionR44HL139241 · NHLBI · SOUNDPIPE, LLC · PI KILROY, JOSEPH P. · 2017 to 2018
$2.0M
Macrophages as modulators of repair after neonatal strokeR01NS076726 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI VEXLER, ZINAIDA S · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R44 HL139241NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB023055NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMolecular ultrasound imaging of tumor vasculature is being actively investigated with microbubble contrast agents targeted to neovasculature biomarkers. Yet, a universal method of targeting tumor vasculature independent of specific biomarkers, or in their absence, would be desirable. We report the use of electrostatic interaction to achieve adherence of microbubbles to tumor vasculature and resulting tumor delineation by ultrasound imaging. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Microbubbles were prepared from decafluorobutane gas by amalgamation of aqueous micellar medium. Distearoyl phosphatidylcholine (DSPC) and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-stearate were used as microbubble shell-forming lipids; cationic lipid distearoyl trimethylammoniumpropane (DSTAP) was included to introduce positive electrostatic charge. Microbubbles were subjected to flotation in normal gravity, to remove larger particles. Murine colon adenocarcinoma tumor (MC38, J. Schlom, National Institutes of Health) was inoculated in the hind leg of C57BL/6 mice. Contrast ultrasound imaging was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, using a clinical imaging system in low power mode, with tissue signal suppression (contrast pulse sequencing, 7 MHz, 1 Hz; Mechanical Index, 0.2). The ultrasound probe was positioned to monitor the tumor and contralateral leg muscle; microbubble contrast signal was monitored for 30 minutes or more, after intravenous bolus administration of 2.10 microbubbles. Individual time point frames were extracted from ultrasound video recording and analyzed with ImageJ.

resultsMean bubble diameter was ~1.6 to 2 μm; 99.9% were less than 5 μm, to prevent blocking blood flow in capillaries. For cationic DSTAP-carrying microbubbles, contrast signal was observed in the tumor beyond 30 minutes after injection. As the fraction of positively charged lipid in the bubble shell was increased, adherent contrast signal in the tumor also increased, but accumulation of DSTAP-microbubbles in the normal muscle increased as well. For bubbles with the highest positive charge tested, DSTAP-DSPC molar ratio 1:4, at 10 minutes after intravenous administration of microbubbles, the contrast signal difference between the tumor and normal muscle was 1.5 (P < 0.005). At 30 minutes, tumor/muscle contrast signal ratio improved and reached 2.1. For the DSTAP-DSPC 1:13 preparation, tumor/muscle signal ratio exceeded 3.6 at 10 minutes and reached 5.4 at 30 minutes. Microbubbles with DSTAP-DSPC ratio 1:22 were optimal for tumor targeting: at 10 minutes, tumor/muscle signal ratio was greater than 7 (P < 0.005); at 30 minutes, greater than 16 (P < 0.01), sufficient for tumor delineation.

conclusionsCationic microbubbles are easy to prepare. They selectively accumulate in the tumor vasculature after intravenous administration. These microbubbles provide target-to-control contrast ratio that can exceed an order of magnitude. Adherent microbubbles delineate the tumor mass at extended time points, at 30 minutes and beyond. This may allow for an extension of the contrast ultrasound examination time. Overall, positively charged microbubbles could become a universal ultrasound contrast agent for cancer imaging.

Indexed as

MicrobubblesAdenocarcinomaAnimalsColonic NeoplasmsContrast MediaMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhosphatidylcholinesPolyethylene GlycolsUltrasonography1,2-distearoyllecithinContrast MediaPhosphatidylcholinespolyethylene glycol monostearatePolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID32569011
PMCPMC10690642
OpenAlexW3036050847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.