Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32568687›Full record

ReviewComputers in biology and medicine2020

COVID-19 Coronavirus spike protein analysis for synthetic vaccines, a peptidomimetic antagonist, and therapeutic drugs, and analysis of a proposed achilles' heel conserved region to minimize probability of escape mutations and drug resistance.

B Robson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computers in biology and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Discontinuation of Antihypertensive Drug Use Compared to Continuation in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Production and Immunogenicity Assessment of LTp50: AnPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. PhytoestrogenVaccines · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Peptides for Vaccine Development.ACS applied bio materials · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Overview of SARS-CoV-2 genome-encoded proteins.Science China. Life sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

B RobsonIngine Inc. Cleveland Ohio USA, The Dirac Foundation, Oxfordshire, UK. Electronic address: barryrobson@ingine.com.
Ingine (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper continues a recent study of the spike protein sequence of the COVID-19 virus (SARS-CoV-2). It is also in part an introductory review to relevant computational techniques for tackling viral threats, using COVID-19 as an example. Q-UEL tools for facilitating access to knowledge and bioinformatics tools were again used for efficiency, but the focus in this paper is even more on the virus. Subsequence KRSFIEDLLFNKV of the S2' spike glycoprotein proteolytic cleavage site continues to appear important. Here it is shown to be recognizable in the common cold coronaviruses, avian coronaviruses and possibly as traces in the nidoviruses of reptiles and fish. Its function or functions thus seem important to the coronaviruses. It might represent SARS-CoV-2 Achilles' heel, less likely to acquire resistance by mutation, as has happened in some early SARS vaccine studies discussed in the previous paper. Preliminary conformational analysis of the receptor (ACE2) binding site of the spike protein is carried out suggesting that while it is somewhat conserved, it appears to be more variable than KRSFIEDLLFNKV. However compounds like emodin that inhibit SARS entry, apparently by binding ACE2, might also have functions at several different human protein binding sites. The enzyme 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 is again argued to be a convenient model pharmacophore perhaps representing an ensemble of targets, and it is noted that it occurs both in lung and alimentary tract. Perhaps it benefits the virus to block an inflammatory response by inhibiting the dehydrogenase, but a fairly complex web involves several possible targets.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusAmino Acid SequenceAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsAntiviral AgentsBinding SitesComputational BiologyCoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDrug DesignDrug Resistance, ViralHost Microbial InteractionsHumansModels, MolecularACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antiviral AgentsCOVID-19 VaccinesPeptidomimeticsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase ASpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccines2019-nCoVBionformaticsCoronavirusCOVID-19PeptidomimeticQ-UEL languageRetroinversoSARS-CoV-2Synthetic vaccineWuhan seafood market coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID32568687
PMCPMC7151553
OpenAlexW3016177857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.