Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32568652›Full record

ArticleStroke2020

Predicting Longitudinal Progression in Functional Mobility After Stroke: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Dongni Buvarp, Lena Rafsten, Katharina S Sunnerhagen

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01622205 phase2completednot on this map

Phase 2 Study of Very Early Supported Discharge From a Stroke Unit in

TypeinterventionalSponsorGöteborg UniversityRan2011 to 2019Enrolled140ConditionsStrokeArmsVery early supported discharge (VESD), Ordinary rehabilitation
NCT06845683 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Dual-Task and Progressive Wall Squat Training on Cognition, Balance and Functional Mobility in Stroke Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsStroke IschemicArmsGroup A, Group B
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dongni BuvarpRehabilitation Research Group, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (D.B., L.R., K.S.S.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lena RafstenRehabilitation Research Group, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (D.B., L.R., K.S.S.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Katharina S SunnerhagenRehabilitation Research Group, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology (D.B., L.R., K.S.S.), University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeA majority of people with stroke remain impaired in their functional mobility. The aim of the study was to determine longitudinal changes in functional mobility after stroke.

methodsThe study was of a longitudinal and prospective design. The functional mobility was assessed using the Timed Up-and-Go test on 5 different occasions: 5 days after onset, within 24 hours after discharge, 1 month after discharge, 3 months, and 1 year poststroke. Stroke severity was stratified based on impairments and activity limitations using a baseline cluster analysis. A multilevel model was developed to predict longitudinal progression in functional mobility based on stroke severity.

resultsOne-hundred-thirty-five patients were included at baseline. Two distinct subgroups (moderate stroke [52%] and mild stroke [48%]) were identified based on impairments and activity limitations using clustering. Ninety-one patients were included in the longitudinal analysis. After controlling for age and cognition, significant improvements in functional mobility were found in the moderate stroke group between baseline and 1 year poststroke (mean difference in Timed Up-and-Go test time, -6.4 s, adjusted

conclusionsThe recovery of functional mobility differs between mild and moderate stroke. Patients with moderate stroke improved their functional mobility during the first 3 months, after which it decreased significantly. These findings suggest that long-term rehabilitation is desirable to maintain and perhaps increase the gained functional mobility. Older patients and those with moderate impairments and activity limitations have particular needs. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01622205.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMotor ActivityProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionStrokeStroke Rehabilitationcluster analysisfollow-upgaitstroketime factors

Identifiers

PMID32568652
PMCPMC7306259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.