ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2020
Longitudinal Renal Function in Liver Transplant Recipients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure.
Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- APASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of acute kidney injury in acute-on-chronic liver failure.Hepatology international · 2024Guideline
- Tracking the trajectory of kidney dysfunction in cirrhosis: the acute kidney injury: chronic kidney disease spectrum.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2025Review
- Combined Organ Transplantation in Patients with Advanced Liver Disease.Seminars in liver disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo analyze the impact of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) immediately before liver transplantation (LT) on short-term kidney function.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we included 416 of 687 consecutive patients who had an estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) at 3-month post-LT. We compared the non-ACLF (N = 356), ACLF with eGFR ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m (A-HGFR, N = 32), and ACLF with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m (A-LGFR, N = 28) groups at LT and for 2 kidney-related outcomes: (i) slope of eGFR by linear mixed model and (ii) time to development of composite kidney outcomes (eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m or need for dialysis).
resultsThe mean eGFRs at LT in non-ACLF, A-HGFR, and A-LGFR groups were significantly different as follows: 83.9 ± 29.5, 56.5 ± 31.2, and 21.6 ± 5.0 mL/min/1.73 m, respectively. The eGFR slope significantly increased in A-LGFR group (+7.26 mL/min/1.73 m/mo), whereas it remained stable in A-HGFR group (+1.05 mL/min/1.73 m/mo) and significantly declined in non-ACLF group (-7.61 mL/min/1.73 m/mo) by the first 3-month period. On the other hand, the eGFR slope in all groups stabilized after 3 months post-LT. A-LGFR group showed significantly increased risk of developing composite kidney outcomes in adjusted analysis (hazard ratio = 3.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.35-9.70) compared with the non-ACLF group. However, this significance disappeared after the further adjustment for eGFR at 3-month post-LT (hazard ratio = 1.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-5.23). DISCUSSION: The slopes of eGFR before 3-month post-LT were significantly different among non-ACLF, A-HGFR, and A-LGFR groups. The renal dysfunction in A-LGFR group stabilized after partial recovery by 3-month post-LT (eGFR reset point).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.