ArticleGigaScience2020
CandiMeth: Powerful yet simple visualization and quantification of DNA methylation at candidate genes.
Article in GigaScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive benefits of folic acid supplementation during pregnancy track with epigenetic changes at an imprint regulator.BMC medicine · 2024Trial
- Folic acid intervention during pregnancy alters DNA methylation, affecting neural target genes through two distinct mechanisms.Clinical epigenetics · 2022Trial
- Genomic, Proteomic, and Phenotypic Biomarkers of COVID-19 Severity: Protocol for a Retrospective Observational Study.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- The UHRF1 protein is a key regulator of retrotransposable elements and innate immune response to viral RNA in human cells.Epigenetics · 2023Article
- CandiMeth: Powerful yet simple visualization and quantification of DNA methylation at candidate genes.GigaScience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDNA methylation microarrays are widely used in clinical epigenetics and are often processed using R packages such as ChAMP or RnBeads by trained bioinformaticians. However, looking at specific genes requires bespoke coding for which wet-lab biologists or clinicians are not trained. This leads to high demands on bioinformaticians, who may lack insight into the specific biological problem. To bridge this gap, we developed a tool for mapping and quantification of methylation differences at candidate genomic features of interest, without using coding.
findingsWe generated the workflow "CandiMeth" (Candidate Methylation) in the web-based environment Galaxy. CandiMeth takes as input any table listing differences in methylation generated by either ChAMP or RnBeads and maps these to the human genome. A simple interface then allows the user to query the data using lists of gene names. CandiMeth generates (i) tracks in the popular UCSC Genome Browser with an intuitive visual indicator of where differences in methylation occur between samples or groups of samples and (ii) tables containing quantitative data on the candidate regions, allowing interpretation of significance. In addition to genes and promoters, CandiMeth can analyse methylation differences at long and short interspersed nuclear elements. Cross-comparison to other open-resource genomic data at UCSC facilitates interpretation of the biological significance of the data and the design of wet-lab assays to further explore methylation changes and their consequences for the candidate genes.
conclusionsCandiMeth (RRID:SCR_017974; Biotools: CandiMeth) allows rapid, quantitative analysis of methylation at user-specified features without the need for coding and is freely available at https://github.com/sjthursby/CandiMeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.