Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32568247›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2020

Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Jennifer A Geisler, Jonathan M Spehar, Sarah A Steck, Anna Bratasz, Reena Shakya, Kimerly Powell, Gina M Sizemore

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. CD146Theranostics · 2026
    Article
  6. Between Prometheus and Thanatos: Reflections on Intracardiac Injection Models for Metastasis in Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer A GeislerThe Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University; Department of Veterinary Biosciences, The Ohio State University.
Jonathan M SpeharThe Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University.
Sarah A SteckThe Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University.
Anna BrataszThe Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University; Davis Heart & Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University.
Reena ShakyaThe Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University.
Kimerly PowellThe Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University; Davis Heart & Lung Research Institute, The Ohio State University.
Gina M SizemoreThe Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University; gina.sizemore@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · USLung Institute · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
PDGFR beta signaling in the tumor microenvironment of metastatic breast cancerK22CA218472 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SIZEMORE, GINA MARIE · 2017 to 2019
$561k
NCI NIH HHS K22 CA218472NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic spread of cancer is an unfortunate consequence of disease progression, aggressive cancer subtypes, and/or late diagnosis. Brain metastases are particularly devastating, difficult to treat, and confer a poor prognosis. While the precise incidence of brain metastases in the United States remains hard to estimate, it is likely to increase as extracranial therapies continue to become more efficacious in treating cancer. Thus, it is necessary to identify and develop novel therapeutic approaches to treat metastasis at this site. To this end, intracranial injection of cancer cells has become a well-established method in which to model brain metastasis. Previously, the inability to directly measure tumor growth has been a technical hindrance to this model; however, increasing availability and quality of small animal imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are vastly improving the ability to monitor tumor growth over time and infer changes within the brain during the experimental period. Herein, intracranial injection of murine mammary tumor cells into immunocompetent mice followed by MRI is demonstrated. The presented injection approach utilizes isoflurane anesthesia and a stereotactic setup with a digitally controlled, automated drill and needle injection to enhance precision, and reduce technical error. MRI is measured over time using a 9.4 Tesla instrument in The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center Small Animal Imaging Shared Resource. Tumor volume measurements are demonstrated at each time point through use of ImageJ. Overall, this intracranial injection approach allows for precise injection, day-to-day monitoring, and accurate tumor volume measurements, which combined greatly enhance the utility of this model system to test novel hypotheses on the drivers of brain metastases.

Indexed as

InjectionsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAnesthesiaAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansMiceStereotaxic TechniquesTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID32568247
PMCPMC8787807
OpenAlexW3034568253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.