Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32567720›Full record

ArticleAnnals of neurology2020

Development and Validation of Forecasting Next Reported Seizure Using e-Diaries.

Daniel M Goldenholz, Shira R Goldenholz, Juan Romero, Rob Moss, Haoqi Sun, Brandon Westover

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Seizure prediction and forecasting: a scoping review.Current opinion in neurology · 2025
    Article
  4. AI and Neurology.Neurological research and practice · 2025
    Review
  5. Long-Term Ambulatory Intracranial EEG.Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prospective validation of a seizure diary forecasting falls short.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Cyclical underreporting of seizures in patient-based seizure documentation.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel M GoldenholzDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8370-2758
Shira R GoldenholzDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Juan RomeroDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rob MossSeizure Tracker, Springfield, Virginia, USA.
Haoqi SunHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brandon WestoverHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4803-312X

Funding

Training in Neurostatistics and NeuroepidemiologyT32NS048005 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI ONNELA, JUKKA-PEKKA · 2004 to 2018
$3.2M
Investigation of Sleep in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU-SLEEP)R01NS102190 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WESTOVER, MICHAEL BRANDON · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
Big Data and Deep Learning for the Interictal-Ictal-Injury ContiuumR01NS107291 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WESTOVER, MICHAEL BRANDON · 2018 to 2022
$2.8M
Quantitative Monitoring and Control of Sedation and Pain in the ICU EnvironmentK23NS090900 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WESTOVER, MICHAEL BRANDON · 2014 to 2018
$988k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS090900NINDS NIH HHS K23NS090900NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102190NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS107291NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS048005NINDS NIH HHS T32NS048005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere are no validated methods for predicting the timing of seizures. Using machine learning, we sought to forecast 24-hour risk of self-reported seizure from e-diaries.

methodsData from 5,419 patients on SeizureTracker.com (including seizure count, type, and duration) were split into training (3,806 patients/1,665,215 patient-days) and testing (1,613 patients/549,588 patient-days) sets with no overlapping patients. An artificial intelligence (AI) program, consisting of recurrent networks followed by a multilayer perceptron ("deep learning" model), was trained to produce risk forecasts. Forecasts were made from a sliding window of 3-month diary history for each day of each patient's diary. After training, the model parameters were held constant and the testing set was scored. A rate-matched random (RMR) forecast was compared to the AI. Comparisons were made using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), a measure of binary discrimination performance, and the Brier score, a measure of forecast calibration. The Brier skill score (BSS) measured the improvement of the AI Brier score compared to the benchmark RMR Brier score. Confidence intervals (CIs) on performance statistics were obtained via bootstrapping.

resultsThe AUC was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.85-0.88) for AI and 0.83 (95% CI = 0.81-0.85) for RMR, favoring AI (p < 0.001). Overall (all patients combined), BSS was 0.27 (95% CI = 0.23-0.31), also favoring AI (p < 0.001).

interpretationThe AI produced a valid forecast superior to a chance forecaster, and provided meaningful forecasts in the majority of patients. Future studies will be needed to quantify the clinical value of these forecasts for patients. ANN NEUROL 2020;88:588-595.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMedical RecordsSeizuresAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32567720
PMCPMC7720795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.