Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32567662›Full record

Observational studyJournal of pediatric psychology2020

Development of an Observational Parental Scaffolding Measure for Youth with Spina Bifida.

Adrien M Winning, Colleen Stiles-Shields, Colleen F Bechtel Driscoll, Diana M Ohanian, Autumn N Crowe, Grayson N Holmbeck

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adrien M WinningDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago.
Colleen Stiles-ShieldsSection of Population Behavioral Health, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center.
Colleen F Bechtel DriscollDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago.
Diana M OhanianDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago.
Autumn N CroweDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago.
Grayson N HolmbeckDepartment of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago.
Loyola University Chicago · USRush University Medical Center · US

Funding

Self-Management in Adolescents and Young Adults with Spina BifidaR01NR016235 · NINR · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HOLMBECK, GRAYSON NEIL · 2016 to 2020
$1.8M
Psychosocial Adjustment in Adolescents with Spina BifidaR01HD048629 · NICHD · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI HOLMBECK, GRAYSON NEIL · 2005 to 2009
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD048629NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016235
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the reliability and validity of a new observational measure of parental scaffolding, as well as the impact of parental scaffolding on academic and social outcomes among youth with spina bifida (SB).

methodsAs part of a larger study, 137 families of youth with SB participated in family interaction tasks and self-report questionnaires at the baseline assessment. Teachers also reported on youth's academic independence and competence, as well as social skills. Guided by previous research and theoretical formulations, a rational approach to measure development was employed whereby maternal and paternal scaffolding composites were created using the Family Interaction Macro-coding System (Holmbeck, Zebracki, Johnson, Belvedere, & Hommeyer (2007). Parent-child interaction macro-coding manual. Unpublished coding system. Chicago: Loyola University Chicago).

resultsThe scaffolding measure demonstrated acceptable interrater and scale reliabilities. Additionally, both the maternal and paternal scaffolding composites were significantly associated with scores from self-report questionnaires of parenting behaviors in the expected directions. Maternal scaffolding was positively associated with IQ, academic competence, academic independence, and social self-control in youth with SB, whereas paternal scaffolding was positively associated with social cooperation and social self-control. Differences in scaffolding emerged between mothers and fathers, as well as across demographic variables.

conclusionInitial findings support the use of the scaffolding measure. Future research should continue to examine the utility of this scaffolding measure in families of youth with SB.

Indexed as

ParentingSpinal DysraphismAdolescentChicagoChildFemaleHumansMaleParentsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesparentingpsychosocial functioningspina bifida

Identifiers

PMID32567662
PMCPMC7306701
OpenAlexW3036617086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.