ArticleCartilage2021
Optimization and Validation of a Human
Article in Cartilage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The F-Actin of In Situ Chondrocytes in Non-Degenerate and Mildly-Degenerate Human Cartilage: Changes With Cell Volume, and Cytoplasmic Processes.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Article
- Bone marrow lesions: plugging the holes in our knowledge using animal models.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023Review
- Bioreactor analyses of tissue ingrowth, ongrowth and remodelling around implants: An alternative to live animal testing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveArticular cartilage is incapable of effective repair following injury or during osteoarthritis. While there have been developments in cartilage repair technologies, there is a need to advance biologically relevant models for preclinical testing of biomaterial and regenerative therapies. This study describes conditions for the effective
designFresh, viable femoral heads were obtained from femoral neck fractures and cultured for up to 10 weeks in (a) Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM); (b) DMEM + mixing; (c) DMEM + 10% human serum (HS); (d) DMEM + 10% HS + mixing. The viability, morphology, volume, and density of fluorescently labelled
resultsChondrocyte viability remained at >95% in DMEM + 10% HS. In DMEM alone, viability remained high for ~4 weeks and then declined. For the other conditions, superficial zone chondrocyte viability fell to <35% at 10 weeks with deeper zones being relatively unaffected. In DMEM + 10% HS at 10 weeks, the number of chondrocytes possessing cytoplasmic processes increased compared with DMEM (
conclusionsIn this
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.