Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32567229›Full record

ArticleMolecular systems biology2020

scClassify: sample size estimation and multiscale classification of cells using single and multiple reference.

Yingxin Lin, Yue Cao, Hani Jieun Kim, Agus Salim, Terence P Speed, David M Lin, Pengyi Yang, Jean Yee Hwa Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular systems biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Computational modelling of cell identity.The Biochemical journal · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Evaluating the Utilities of Foundation Models in Single-Cell Data Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yingxin LinSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Yue CaoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hani Jieun KimSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Agus SalimDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Terence P SpeedBioinformatics Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5403-7998
David M LinDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Pengyi YangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1098-3138
Jean Yee Hwa YangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Protocadherins in vertebrate self recognitionR21DC015107 · NIDCD · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI LIN, DAVID M. · 2017 to 2018
$412k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC015107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated cell type identification is a key computational challenge in single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. To capitalise on the large collection of well-annotated scRNA-seq datasets, we developed scClassify, a multiscale classification framework based on ensemble learning and cell type hierarchies constructed from single or multiple annotated datasets as references. scClassify enables the estimation of sample size required for accurate classification of cell types in a cell type hierarchy and allows joint classification of cells when multiple references are available. We show that scClassify consistently performs better than other supervised cell type classification methods across 114 pairs of reference and testing data, representing a diverse combination of sizes, technologies and levels of complexity, and further demonstrate the unique components of scClassify through simulations and compendia of experimental datasets. Finally, we demonstrate the scalability of scClassify on large single-cell atlases and highlight a novel application of identifying subpopulations of cells from the Tabula Muris data that were unidentified in the original publication. Together, scClassify represents state-of-the-art methodology in automated cell type identification from scRNA-seq data.

Indexed as

AnimalsCellsCluster AnalysisDatabases as TopicHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearMachine LearningMicePancreasSample SizeSoftwarecell type hierarchycell type identificationmultiscale classificationsample size estimationsingle-cell

Identifiers

PMID32567229
PMCPMC7306901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.