Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32567030›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2020

Gravity prior in human behaviour: a perceptual or semantic phenomenon?

Maria Gallagher, Agoston Torok, Johanna Klaas, Elisa Raffaella Ferrè

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cognition in zero gravity: Effects of non-terrestrial gravity on human behaviour.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria GallagherDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW200EX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2933-4579
Agoston TorokBrain Imaging Centre RCNS, Magyar tudosok krt 2, Budapest, 1111, Hungary.
Johanna KlaasDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW200EX, UK.
Elisa Raffaella FerrèDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW200EX, UK. e.ferre@rhul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0643-848X

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council DTC PhD Studentship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans show a gravitational advantage in perception: we are more precise at judging the speed of downwards-moving than upwards-moving objects, indicating that gravitational acceleration is an internalised prior. However, it is unclear whether this gravity prior is based on purely perceptual cues or whether it can incorporate semantic knowledge. Previous research has used only objects which are known to comply with gravity, possibly confounding semantic and perceptual cues. Here we have addressed this question by asking participants to judge the speed of objects that typically move coherently with gravity (ball) or against it (rocket). Our results showed a perceptual advantage for falling stimuli, irrespective of object identity, suggesting the gravity prior is based on perceptual cues.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionSemanticsAccelerationCuesGravitationHumansGraviceptionGravity priorPerceptionVisual motion

Identifiers

PMID32567030
PMCPMC7438378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.