ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020
Superpixel-based deep convolutional neural networks and active contour model for automatic prostate segmentation on 3D MRI scans.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Deep Learning Prostate MRI Segmentation Accuracy and Robustness: A Systematic Review.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Pooled it
- Prior knowledge of anatomical relationships supports automatic delineation of clinical target volume for cervical cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Catalyzing Precision Medicine: Artificial Intelligence Advancements in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Management.Cancers · 2024Review
- Automated prostate multi-regional segmentation in magnetic resonance using fully convolutional neural networks.European radiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Harmonization Strategies in Multicenter MRI-Based Radiomics.Journal of imaging · 2022Review
- Radiomics: a primer on high-throughput image phenotyping.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Review
- Transfer Learning-Based Multi-Scale Denoising Convolutional Neural Network for Prostate Cancer Detection.Cancers · 2022Article
- Effects of group housing and incremental hay supplementation in calf starters at different ages on growth performance, behavior, and health.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A hybrid approach based on deep learning and level set formulation for liver segmentation in CT images.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automatic and reliable prostate segmentation is an essential prerequisite for assisting the diagnosis and treatment, such as guiding biopsy procedure and radiation therapy. Nonetheless, automatic segmentation is challenging due to the lack of clear prostate boundaries owing to the similar appearance of prostate and surrounding tissues and the wide variation in size and shape among different patients ascribed to pathological changes or different resolutions of images. In this regard, the state-of-the-art includes methods based on a probabilistic atlas, active contour models, and deep learning techniques. However, these techniques have limitations that need to be addressed, such as MRI scans with the same spatial resolution, initialization of the prostate region with well-defined contours and a set of hyperparameters of deep learning techniques determined manually, respectively. Therefore, this paper proposes an automatic and novel coarse-to-fine segmentation method for prostate 3D MRI scans. The coarse segmentation step combines local texture and spatial information using the Intrinsic Manifold Simple Linear Iterative Clustering algorithm and probabilistic atlas in a deep convolutional neural networks model jointly with the particle swarm optimization algorithm to classify prostate and non-prostate tissues. Then, the fine segmentation uses the 3D Chan-Vese active contour model to obtain the final prostate surface. The proposed method has been evaluated on the Prostate 3T and PROMISE12 databases presenting a dice similarity coefficient of 84.86%, relative volume difference of 14.53%, sensitivity of 90.73%, specificity of 99.46%, and accuracy of 99.11%. Experimental results demonstrate the high performance potential of the proposed method compared to those previously published.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32566988What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.