Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32566919›Full record

ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2020

Distinguishing Pharmacokinetics of Marketed Nanomedicine Formulations Using a Stable Isotope Tracer Assay.

Sarah L Skoczen, Kelsie S Snapp, Rachael M Crist, Darby Kozak, Xiaohui Jiang, Hao Liu, Stephan T Stern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advancements in Nanoparticle Characterization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah L SkoczenNanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland 21702, United States.
Kelsie S SnappNanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland 21702, United States.
Rachael M CristNanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland 21702, United States.
Darby KozakOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States.
Xiaohui JiangOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States.
Hao LiuOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States.
Stephan T SternNanotechnology Characterization Laboratory, Cancer Research Technology Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory, Frederick, Maryland 21702, United States.

Funding

CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001ENCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201500003I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of nanomedicines are complicated by the unique dispositional characteristics of the drug carrier. Most simplistically, the carrier could be a solubilizing platform that allows administration of a hydrophobic drug. Alternatively, the carrier could be stable and release the drug in a controlled manner, allowing for distribution of the carrier to influence distribution of the encapsulated drug. A third potential dispositional mechanism is carriers that are not stably complexed to the drug, but rather bind the drug in a dynamic equilibrium, similar to the binding of unbound drug to protein; since the nanocarrier has distributional and binding characteristics unlike plasma proteins, the equilibrium binding of drug to a nanocarrier can affect pharmacokinetics in unexpected ways, diverging from classical protein binding paradigms. The recently developed stable isotope tracer ultrafiltration assay (SITUA) for nanomedicine fractionation is uniquely suited for distinguishing and comparing these carrier/drug interactions. Here we present the the encapsulated, unencapsulated, and unbound drug fraction pharmacokinetic profiles in rats for marketed nanomedicines, representing examples of controlled release (doxorubicin liposomes, Doxil; and doxorubicin HCl liposome generic), equilibrium binding (paclitaxel cremophor micelle solution, Taxol generic), and solubilizing (paclitaxel albumin nanoparticle, Abraxane; and paclitaxel polylactic acid micelle, Genexol-PM) nanomedicine formulations. The utility of the SITUA method in differentiating these unique pharmacokinetic profiles and its potential for use in establishing generic nanomedicine bioequivalence are discussed.

Identifiers

PMID32566919
PMCPMC7296544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.