ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2020
Distinguishing Pharmacokinetics of Marketed Nanomedicine Formulations Using a Stable Isotope Tracer Assay.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The colloidal stability of albumin-based drug delivery systems has a profound effect on tumoricidal activity.Drug delivery · 2026Article
- Preclinical Development and Phase I Study of ZSYY001, a Polymeric Micellar Paclitaxel for Advanced Solid Tumor.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Advanced bioanalytical techniques for pharmacokinetic studies of nanocarrier drug delivery systems.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- Current state of nanomedicine drug products: An industry perspective.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Article
- In vitro assessment of nanomedicines' propensity to cause palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia: A Doxil vs. doxorubicin case study.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2024Article
- Polycaprolactone - Vitamin E TPGS micelles for delivery of paclitaxel: In vitro and in vivo evaluation.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2024Article
- Advancements in Nanoparticle Characterization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Progressing nanotechnology to improve targeted cancer treatment: overcoming hurdles in its clinical implementation.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- Trends and patterns in cancer nanotechnology research: A survey of NCI's caNanoLab and nanotechnology characterization laboratory.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
- A comparative biodistribution study of polymeric and lipid-based nanoparticles.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022Article
- The Hitchhiker's Guide to Human Therapeutic Nanoparticle Development.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Article
- Nanomedicine Reformulation of Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- A reanalysis of nanoparticle tumor delivery using classical pharmacokinetic metrics.Science advances · 2020Article
- Polymeric micelles for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs: From nanoformulation to clinical approval.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020Review
- Advancing Medical Applications of Cancer Nanotechnology: Highlighting Two Decades of the NCI'S Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory Service to the Research Community.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics of nanomedicines are complicated by the unique dispositional characteristics of the drug carrier. Most simplistically, the carrier could be a solubilizing platform that allows administration of a hydrophobic drug. Alternatively, the carrier could be stable and release the drug in a controlled manner, allowing for distribution of the carrier to influence distribution of the encapsulated drug. A third potential dispositional mechanism is carriers that are not stably complexed to the drug, but rather bind the drug in a dynamic equilibrium, similar to the binding of unbound drug to protein; since the nanocarrier has distributional and binding characteristics unlike plasma proteins, the equilibrium binding of drug to a nanocarrier can affect pharmacokinetics in unexpected ways, diverging from classical protein binding paradigms. The recently developed stable isotope tracer ultrafiltration assay (SITUA) for nanomedicine fractionation is uniquely suited for distinguishing and comparing these carrier/drug interactions. Here we present the the encapsulated, unencapsulated, and unbound drug fraction pharmacokinetic profiles in rats for marketed nanomedicines, representing examples of controlled release (doxorubicin liposomes, Doxil; and doxorubicin HCl liposome generic), equilibrium binding (paclitaxel cremophor micelle solution, Taxol generic), and solubilizing (paclitaxel albumin nanoparticle, Abraxane; and paclitaxel polylactic acid micelle, Genexol-PM) nanomedicine formulations. The utility of the SITUA method in differentiating these unique pharmacokinetic profiles and its potential for use in establishing generic nanomedicine bioequivalence are discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.