ArticleACS omega2020
Synergy of Hydrothermal and Organic Acid Washing Treatments in Chinese Fir Wood Vinegar Preparation.
Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hydrothermal Carbonization ofACS omega · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pretreatment is an effective method to change the pyrolysis behavior and improve the product properties of biomass. In this study, the effects of hydrothermal treatment (HTT) and hydrothermal treatment combined with organic acid washing (HTT-A) on Chinese fir waste (CF) pyrolysis and preparation of wood vinegar (WV) were investigated. The results indicated that HTT promoted the decomposition of hemicellulose and disrupted the chemical structure, while HTT-A partly removed the lignin as well as hemicellulose. HTT-A showed a more effective removal efficiency of alkali/alkaline earth metals (AAEMs) than HTT. Both HTT and HTT-A delayed the initial decomposition temperature but promoted the pyrolysis process. The yields of WVs increased after HTT and HTT-A, while the moisture contents reduced, obviously. HTT increased the relative contents of phenols from 47.04 to 59.85% but reduced the relative contents of acids from 24.31 to 18.38%, whereas HHT-A reduced the relative contents of phenols but increased those of aldehydes. In addition, HTT and HTT-A showed the different effects on chemical compositions of WVs, especially for phenolic and acid compounds. This study indicated that HTT and HTT-A were the efficient methods to produce WVs with target chemical components, which would be conducive to the efficient application of WVs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.