ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2020
The RABBIT risk-based approach to clinical implementation of new technology: SRS as a case study.
Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of prospective hazard analysis in radiation therapy.Medical physics · 2025Pooled it
- A Modular System for Treating Moving Anatomical Targets With Scanned Ion Beams at Multiple Facilities: Pre-Clinical Testing for Quality and Safety of Beam Delivery.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiation oncology technology continues to evolve rapidly, resulting in advanced versions frequently being brought to market. Before a new product is used standard tests are carried out to reduce the risks associated with failure of the equipment to comply with well-established technical specifications. It is much harder to identify and reduce the risks associated with how the new technology is used clinically, such as those related to poor communication and high workload. To ensure that new technology and techniques are used safely and appropriately the implementation project should be managed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) made up of representatives from all the relevant professions. The MDT's role is to agree on the project scope, identify and rank all risks and benefits, and direct resources towards mitigating the highest risks. Before clinical release there should be consensus from the MDT that the benefits of the new technology outweigh the residual risks. The introduction of initiatives to optimise current practice may involve major changes which can be met with barriers such as limited support from management, insufficient time for MDT meetings, and staff fearful of being shown to have poor practices. To help overcome these challenges our team at St George Hospital Cancer Care Centre has developed a Risk and Benefit Balance Impact Template (RABBIT), which guides an MDT through the rapid implementation and safe use of new technology and techniques with an easy to follow Microsoft Word document. The implementation of stereotactic radiosurgery is used as a case study to illustrate the RABBIT methodology. The RABBIT is a user-friendly method for a busy radiotherapy clinic to transition to a risk-based MDT approach for the implementation of new technologies and techniques. When staff from all disciplines feel empowered to raise concerns about risks the workplace become inherently safer for patients and staff alike.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.