Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32566718›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2020

Revision of a Fractured Titanium Modular Revision Hip Stem Without Removal of the Well-Fixed Part of the Stem: A New Approach Using a Cemented Tube.

Tilman Johannes Graulich, Pascal Graeff, Thorsten Heidenblut, Christian Krettek, Emmanouil Liodakis

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tilman Johannes GraulichTrauma Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Pascal GraeffTrauma Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Thorsten HeidenblutInstitute of Material Science From the Leibniz University of Hannover, Garbsen, Germany.
Christian KrettekTrauma Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Emmanouil LiodakisTrauma Department, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DELeibniz University Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Component fracture is a rare cause for revision in total hip arthroplasty. For a fractured well-fixed long femoral stem, the options are limited. We sought to develop a technique to address this problem with lower morbidity. A newly developed cemented tube was constructed and cemented onto a fractured Revitan revision hip femoral stem to retain the distal well-fixed component. At the 2-year follow-up, the Harris Hip Score, pain level, and radiographic images were analyzed. At the 2-year follow-up, no radiological signs of loosening or failure could be observed. The patient's preoperative Harris Hip Score improved from 42.8 to 97 points. The pain level improved from 7/10 to 0/10. Our case report depicts excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes at 2-year follow-up by a newly developed cemented tube technique. This technique is a potential new option for revision of fractured well-fixed diaphyseal stems without major bone loss. Our successful results suggest this technique is worthy of consideration and further study.

Indexed as

Fractured stemHip arthroplastyImplant failureRevision surgery

Identifiers

PMID32566718
PMCPMC7298535
OpenAlexW3034245794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.