Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32566650›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Jie Zhou, Zhiman Xie, Ping Cui, Qisi Su, Yu Zhang, Lijia Luo, Zhuoxin Li, Li Ye, Hao Liang, Jiegang Huang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The role of NaPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jie ZhouGuangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6164-3649
Zhiman XieThe Fourth Hospital of Nanning, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Ping CuiGuangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Qisi SuThe Fourth Hospital of Nanning, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yu ZhangGuangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Lijia LuoGuangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zhuoxin LiGuangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Li YeGuangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7688-4867
Hao LiangGuangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7534-5124
Jiegang HuangGuangxi Key Laboratory of AIDS Prevention and Treatment, School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-1694
Guangxi Medical University · CNThe Fourth People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study is aimed at identifying unknown clinically relevant genes involved in colorectal cancer using bioinformatics analysis.

methodsOriginal microarray datasets GSE107499 (ulcerative colitis), GSE8671 (colorectal adenoma), and GSE32323 (colorectal cancer) were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus. Common differentially expressed genes were filtered from the three datasets above. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses were performed, followed by construction of a protein-protein interaction network to identify hub genes. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and TIMER database analysis were used to screen the genes related to the prognosis and tumour-infiltrating immune cells of colorectal cancer. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess whether the genes could be used as markers for the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, colorectal adenoma, and colorectal cancer.

resultsA total of 237 differentially expressed genes common to the three datasets were identified, of which 60 were upregulated, 125 were downregulated, and 52 genes that were inconsistently up- and downregulated. Common differentially expressed genes were mainly enriched in the cellular component of extracellular exosome and integral component of membrane categories. Eight hub genes, i.e.,

conclusionThree novel genes,

Indexed as

ContactinsExcitatory Amino Acid Transporter 3Monocarboxylic Acid TransportersBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsComputational BiologyGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansProtein Interaction MapsROC CurveTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorCNTN3 protein, humanContactinsExcitatory Amino Acid Transporter 3Monocarboxylic Acid TransportersSLC16A9 protein, humanSLC1A1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32566650
PMCPMC7273407
OpenAlexW3032651629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.