ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020
High clinical impact of rapid susceptibility testing on CHROMID ESBL
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global mapping of antibiotic resistance rates among clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024Pooled it
- Analysis of the Concordance Between the Use of Phenotypic Screening Tests with the β-Lactamase Gene Profile in Selected Gram-Negative Bacteria.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Reliability of a Screening Method Using Antibiotic Disks to Detect Carbapenemases in Glucose-Nonfermenting Gram-Negative Microorganisms From Clinical Samples of a Regional Hospital in Southeastern Spain.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024Article
- ESBL-Positive Enterobacteriaceae from Dogs of Santiago and Boa Vista Islands, Cape Verde: A Public Health Concern.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Detection of synergistic antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from post-operative wound infections.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Clinical Relevance of Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles for Screening Gram-negative Microorganisms Resistant to Beta-Lactam Antibiotics.Microorganisms · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntibiotic resistance is a serious public health challenge exacerbated by the widespread use of β-lactam and glycopeptide antibiotics. The identification of resistances is crucial, and CHROMID ESBL medium has been developed to detect enterobacteria with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL). The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of this medium to detect other types of resistant bacteria.
methodsVancomycin, cefoxitin, imipenem, and cefepime disks were used to measure growth on CHROMID ESBL medium of β-lactam-resistant Gram-negative (83 with ESBL, 57 with carbapenemases, 35 with AmpC and 3
resultsRetrospective study: species grown on the medium exhibited different colors. Growth on the medium was observed for: all ESBL enterobacteria, which were susceptible to imipenem and cefoxitin; 95% of isolates with carbapenemases, mostly resistant to imipenem; 80% of those with AmpC; 86% of vancoR
conclusionsCHROMID ESBL medium permitted the differential growth of Gram-negative bacteria, many with ESBL and carbapenemases. ESBL enterobacteria were susceptible to imipenem, carbapenemase-producing microorganisms grew around the imipenem disk, and vancoR
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.