Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32566577›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020

Sharp recanalization of the brachiocephalic vein occlusion through the external jugular vein in hemodialysis patients.

Yuliang Zhao, Feng Lin, Letian Yang, Baiyu Qiao, Yating Wang, Yang Yu, Tianlei Cui, Ping Fu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review of Sharp Recanalization Techniques in Central Venous Occlusions.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Management of Central Venous Stenoses and Occlusions.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuliang ZhaoDivison of Nephrology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Feng LinDepartment of Operations Management, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Letian YangDivison of Nephrology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Baiyu QiaoWest China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yating WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Louis A. Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yang YuDivison of Nephrology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Tianlei CuiDivison of Nephrology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Ping FuDivison of Nephrology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNWeiss Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the internal jugular vein (IJV) is the most widely used puncture site in hemodialysis catheter insertion and central vein angioplasty, the external jugular vein (EJV) offers an alternative vascular access point in cases when the IJV is inaccessible. The present study aims to observe the efficacy and safety of sharp recanalization of the brachiocephalic vein occlusion through the EJV in hemodialysis patients.

methodsThis retrospective study enrolled a cohort of hemodialysis patients who received sharp recanalization of occlusive brachiocephalic vein through the EJV at a university-affiliated hospital between January 2017 and January 2019. The demographic information and clinical outcome data of the patients were collected and analyzed.

resultsA total of 16 hemodialysis patients who received right brachiocephalic vein sharp recanalization through the EJV were analyzed. The technical success rate was 100%. Twelve patients (12/16, 75%), whose EJV-subclavian vein angle (E-S angle) was 60-80 degrees, were successfully recanalized on the first attempt. With the other 4 patients (4/16, 25%), whose E-S angle approached 90 degrees, the brachiocephalic vein was recanalized on the second attempt by elevating the ipsilateral shoulder, therefore decreasing the E-S angle to align the course of the EJV with the brachiocephalic vein. Three minor complications were recorded, including 1 patient with blood continuously oozing from the EJV at the puncture site and 2 patients with mild chest pain. After an average of 10 months of follow-up, the clinical patent rate was 81.25% with no procedure-related complications reported.

conclusionsSharp recanalization through the EJV could be an effective and safe alternative treatment for right brachiocephalic vein occlusion in hemodialysis patients if performed by an experienced practitioner. Measuring the angle formed by the EJV and the subclavian vein might provide helpful information for selecting patients.

Indexed as

anglebrachiocephalic vein occlusionexternal jugular vein (EJV)hemodialysisSharp recanalization

Identifiers

PMID32566577
PMCPMC7290652
OpenAlexW3026243539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.