ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2020
Correlation between corneal demarcation line depth in epithelium-off and trans-epithelium accelerated corneal cross linking and keratoconus progression.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epithelium-on versus epithelium-off corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison Between Pulsed and Continuous Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking Protocols.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Biomechanics of Ophthalmic Crosslinking.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare corneal demarcation line (DL) depth in both accelerated epithelium-off and trans-epithelium cross linking (CXL) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and its relation to maximum keratometry (Kmax) progression in both techniques.
methodsA prospective comparative interventional study where patients with mild to moderate keratoconus (KC) were classified into two groups: accelerated epithelium-off and trans-epithelium CXL based on corneal pachymetry. Assessment of corneal DL depth was carried out after 3mo by AS-OCT. Kmax readings were evaluated after one year follow up using the Scheimpflug imaging system.
resultsStudy included 74 eyes of 44 patients. Group A underwent epithelium-off CXL (41 eyes), while Group B underwent trans-epithelium CXL (33 eyes). At 3mo follow up, mean corneal DL depth in Group A was 219.9±58.4 µm while in Group B was 127.2±7.8 µm (
conclusionDespite a significantly deeper corneal DL depth created by accelerated epithelium-off CXL technique compared to accelerated trans-epithelium CXL, there is no significant impact on keratoconus progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.