ArticlePeerJ2020
Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding the landscape of cell-type-specific co-expressed transcription factors in soybean.Nature plants · 2026Article
- Genome-wide identification ofPeerJ · 2026Article
- Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of Dof gene family members in mulberry trees (Morus notabilis L.) under drought stress.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Characterization and Functional Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Screening and Identification of Drought-Tolerant Genes in Tomato (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genome-wide identification of DNA-binding with one finger transcription factor genes in Chinese chestnut and their response to abiotic stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Identification and Characterization of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Identification of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Genome-wide identification and molecular evolution of Dof gene family in Camellia oleifera.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Identification of Dof transcription factors inFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Identification and functional analysis of theFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Identification and characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- DOF transcription factors: Specific regulators of plant biological processes.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Integrated transcriptome and methylome analyses reveal the molecular regulation of drought stress in wild strawberry (Fragaria nilgerrensis).BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of Dof transcription factor family in Camelina sativa.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis ofGenes · 2022Article
- Transcriptome-wide identification of walnut PP2C family genes in response to external stimulus.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Analysis and Expression Profiles of the Dof Family inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA-binding one zinc finger (Dof) proteins are plant-specific transcription factors important for seed development, hormone regulation, and defense against abiotic stress. Although drought stress is a key determinant of plant physiology and metabolic homeostasis, the role of
methodsTea plants (
resultsWe identified 16
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.