Trial reportJournal of obesity2020
Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Nonbanded Sleeve: Midterm Results from a Prospective Randomized Study.
Trial report in Journal of obesity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04228185 (Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Non-banded Sleeve), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Non-banded Sleeve: Mid-term Results From a Prospective Randomized Study
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Naturally Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Vs Non-Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy, Two Years Follow up, Controlled Clinical Trial.Obesity surgery · 2026Trial
- Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Revisional One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial.Obesity surgery · 2022Trial
- Evaluating The Impact of Ring Augmentation In Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Propensity-weighted Cohort Study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Article
- Molecular Mechanisms Affecting Statin Pharmacokinetics after Bariatric Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Banded Versus Non-banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: 5-Year Results of a 3-Year Randomized Controlled Trial.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Review
- Comparison of the mid-term outcomes of banded and non-banded sleeve gastrectomy: safety, food tolerance, and weight regain.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Assessing psychopathology in bariatric surgery candidates: discriminant validity of the SCL-90-R and SCL-K-9 in a large sample of patients.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2021Article
- Measuring Knowledge, Attitudes, and Barriers to Medication Adherence in Potential Bariatric Surgery Patients.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Neurocognitive and Psychopathological Predictors of Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: A 4-Year Follow-Up Study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
- Bariatric Surgery Closure During COVID-19 Lockdown in Italy: The Perspective of Waiting List Candidates.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Weight regain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is nowadays a growing concern. Sleeve dilatation and loss of food restriction is considered the main mechanism. The placement of a silicon ring around the gastric tube seems to give benefits in the short term. We report the results of a randomized study comparing LSG and laparoscopic banded sleeve gastrectomy (LBSG) over a 4-year follow-up. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of banded sleeve gastrectomy compared to standard sleeve in the midterm. Methods: Between 01/2014 and 01/2015, we randomly assigned 50 patients to receive one of the two procedures. Patients' management was exactly the same, apart from the band placement. We analyzed differences in weight loss, operative time, complication rate, and mortality, with a median follow-up of 4 years. Results: Twenty five patients were assigned to receive LSG (Group A) and 25 LBSG (Group B). The mean preoperative BMI (body mass index) was 47.3 ± 6.58 kg/m Conclusions: LBSG is a safe procedure, with no impact on postoperative complications. The banded sleeve showed a significant greater weight loss in the midterm follow-up. Considering the issue of weight regain observed after LSG, the placement of a perigastric ring during the first procedure may be a strategy to improve the results. This trial is registered with NCT04228185.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.