Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32566251›Full record

ArticleNPJ Regenerative medicine2020

Neural stem cell delivery via porous collagen scaffolds promotes neuronal differentiation and locomotion recovery in spinal cord injury.

Alexandra Kourgiantaki, Dimitrios S Tzeranis, Kanelina Karali, Konstantina Georgelou, Efstathia Bampoula, Sotirios Psilodimitrakopoulos, Ioannis V Yannas, Emmanuel Stratakis, Kyriaki Sidiropoulou, Ioannis Charalampopoulos and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Personalized Stem Cell-Based Regeneration in Spinal Cord Injury Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Plant Cellulose as a Substrate for 3D Neural Stem Cell Culture.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra Kourgiantaki *Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71003 Greece.
Dimitrios S Tzeranis *Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Heraklion, 71003 Greece.
Kanelina Karali *Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71003 Greece.
Konstantina GeorgelouDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71003 Greece.
Efstathia BampoulaDepartment of Biology, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71003 Greece.
Sotirios PsilodimitrakopoulosInstitute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Heraklion, 71003 Greece.
Ioannis V YannasDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
Emmanuel StratakisInstitute of Electronic Structure and Laser, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Heraklion, 71003 Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1908-8618
Kyriaki SidiropoulouInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Heraklion, 71003 Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7400-4678
Ioannis CharalampopoulosDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71003 Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-3415-7332
Achille GravanisDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71003 Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5435-1939
University of Crete · GRFoundation for Research and Technology Hellas · GRMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural stem cell (NSC) grafts have demonstrated significant effects in animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI), yet their clinical translation remains challenging. Significant evidence suggests that the supporting matrix of NSC grafts has a crucial role in regulating NSC effects. Here we demonstrate that grafts based on porous collagen-based scaffolds (PCSs), similar to biomaterials utilized clinically in induced regeneration, can deliver and protect embryonic NSCs at SCI sites, leading to significant improvement in locomotion recovery in an experimental mouse SCI model, so that 12 weeks post-injury locomotion performance of implanted animals does not statistically differ from that of uninjured control animals. NSC-seeded PCS grafts can modulate key processes required to induce regeneration in SCI lesions including enhancing NSC neuronal differentiation and functional integration in vivo, enabling robust axonal elongation, and reducing astrogliosis. Our findings suggest that the efficacy and translational potential of emerging NSC-based SCI therapies could be enhanced by delivering NSC via scaffolds derived from well-characterized clinically proven PCS.

Indexed as

Neural stem cellsSpinal cord injuryTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID32566251
PMCPMC7295991
OpenAlexW3034567829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.