Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32566187›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2020

Assessment of aflatoxin in milk and feed samples and impact of seasonal variations in the Punjab, Pakistan.

Naveed Akbar, Muhammad Nasir, Naureen Naeem, Mansur-Ud-Din Ahmad, Farhan Saeed, Faqir Muhammad Anjum, Sanaullah Iqbal, Muhammad Imran, Tabussam Tufail, Faiz-Ul-Hassan Shah and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Prevalence of contamination of aflatoxin MEnvironmental monitoring and assessment · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Determination of Aflatoxin MFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Naveed AkbarDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore Pakistan.
Muhammad NasirDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore Pakistan.
Naureen NaeemDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore Pakistan.
Mansur-Ud-Din AhmadDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore Pakistan.
Farhan SaeedInstitute of Home and Food Sciences Government College University Faisalabad Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5340-4015
Faqir Muhammad AnjumUniversity of The Gambia Gambia Gambia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6158-7077
Sanaullah IqbalDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Lahore Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8455-8885
Muhammad ImranUniversity Institute of Diet and Nutritional Sciences Faculty of Allied Health Sciences The University of Lahore Lahore Pakistan.
Tabussam TufailUniversity Institute of Diet and Nutritional Sciences Faculty of Allied Health Sciences The University of Lahore Lahore Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7632-5261
Faiz-Ul-Hassan ShahUniversity Institute of Diet and Nutritional Sciences Faculty of Allied Health Sciences The University of Lahore Lahore Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7690-9032
Muhammad AtifDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences College of Applied Medical Sciences Jouf University Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Sakaka.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was designed to assess the incidence of aflatoxin contamination in animal feed and raw milk samples (total 240 each) collected from dairy farms during the complete year of 2015. These samples were collected through a cluster random sampling technique by dividing the province of Punjab, Pakistan into five clusters (north, south, east, west and central). Factors (environmental & physical) affecting aflatoxin contamination in milk and animal feed at farms were also studied. The AFM1 levels in raw milk & AFB1 levels in feed samples were analyzed by using the ELISA technique. Results demonstrated that overall about 53% raw milk samples from dairy farms were contaminated beyond the US MRL (0.50 µg/L) for AFM1 with than average level of 0.59 µg/L, while the 95% farm feed samples were exceeding the FDA MRL (20 µg/kg) of AFB1 with average level of 43 µg/kg. During winter season, the concentration of AFM1 was higher in all clusters with avg 0.68 µg/L, while the AFB1 contamination was highest in the spring season with avg 54 µg/kg. Market feed prices had negative correlation with AFB1 contamilevels, which were further supported by the positive correlation between quantity of feed at farms with AFM1 and AFB1 contamination. Results exhibited significantly positive impact of environmental factors on milk and feed aflatoxin contamination levels, whereas temperature showed an inverse relationship with AFM1 and AFB1 levels. The study recommends need of synergistic extension work to support dairy farms and highlight the contamination levels for regulatory bodies to introduce strategic policies for control measures.

Indexed as

aflatoxin B1aflatoxin M1feed ingredientsmycotoxins

Identifiers

PMID32566187
PMCPMC7300088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.