Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32565923›Full record

ReviewShoulder & elbow2020

Radial head fractures.

R P van Riet, Mpj van den Bekerom, A Van Tongel, C Spross, R Barco, A C Watts

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Shoulder & elbow, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Management of Elderly Elbow Fractures.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

R P van RietDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Monica Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4866-5867
Mpj van den BekeromShoulder and Elbow Unit, Joint Research, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A Van TongelDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, UZ Gent, Ghent, Belgium.
C SprossDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
R BarcoUpper Limb Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
A C WattsUpper Limb Unit, Wrightington Hospital, UK.
Antwerp University Hospital · BEGhent University Hospital · BEHospital Universitario La Paz · ESJoint Research Centre · NLUniversity of Zurich · CHWrightington Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shape and size of the radial head is highly variable but correlates to the contralateral side. The radial head is a secondary stabilizer to valgus stress and provides lateral stability. The modified Mason-Hotchkiss classification is the most commonly used and describes three types, depending on the number of fragments and their displacement. Type 1 fractures are typically treated conservatively. Surgical reduction and fixation are recommended for type 2 fractures, if there is a mechanical block to motion. This can be done arthroscopically or open. Controversy exists for two-part fractures with >2 mm and <5 mm displacement, without a mechanical bloc as good results have been published with conservative treatment. Type 3 fractures are often treated with radial head replacement. Although radial head resection is also an option as long-term results have been shown to be favourable. Radial head arthroplasty is recommended in type 3 fractures with ligamentous injury or proximal ulna fractures. Failure of primary radial head replacement may be due to several factors. Identification of the cause of failure is essential. Failed radial head arthroplasty can be treated by implant removal alone, interposition arthroplasty, revision radial head replacement either as a single stage or two-stage procedure.

Indexed as

arthroscopyelbowfractureinstabilityprosthesisradial headradius

Identifiers

PMID32565923
PMCPMC7285971
OpenAlexW2975567228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.