Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32565844›Full record

ReviewAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2020

Efficacy of omalizumab in children, adolescents, and adults with severe allergic asthma: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and call for new trials using current guidelines for assessment of severe asthma.

Daniel P Henriksen, Uffe Bodtger, Kirsten Sidenius, Niels Maltbaek, Lars Pedersen, Hanne Madsen, Ehm A Andersson, Ole Norgaard, Louise K Madsen, Bo L Chawes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of asthma: from bench to bedside.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Wildfire and asthma - The prospective interventions.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Unanswered questions on the use of biologics in pediatric asthma.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel P HenriksenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1303-6195
Uffe BodtgerDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Næstved Hospital, Næstved, Denmark.
Kirsten SideniusAllergi og Lungeklinikken Helsingør, Helsingør, Denmark.
Niels MaltbaekDepartment of Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Lars PedersenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hanne MadsenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Ehm A AnderssonThe Danish Medicines Council Secretariat, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ole NorgaardThe Danish Medicines Council Secretariat, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Louise K MadsenThe Danish Medicines Council Secretariat, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bo L ChawesCOPSAC, Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Ledreborg Allé 34, Gentofte, 2820 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Danish Medicines Agency · DKZealand University Hospital · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DKOdense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOmalizumab is approved for treating severe allergic asthma from age 6, but the definition of severe asthma including a systematic assessment to rule out difficult-to-treat asthma has changed since the drug was approved in 2003.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of two critical (exacerbation rate, oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment) and eight important clinical outcomes in children, adolescents and adults, and specifically searched papers for systematic assessment of severe asthma.

resultsAdults: seven studies (n = 2159) ascertaining exacerbation rate showing a 37% (95% CI 21-50) reduction in favor of omalizumab, larger than the pre-specified minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 25%. Only one open-label study (n = 82) was identified assessing the percentage of patients experiencing reduction of OCS-maintenance treatment showing a significantly greater decrease in the omalizumab group (- 45% vs. + 18.3%, p = 0.002). Children and adolescents: four studies (n = 1551) reported data on exacerbations (no meta-analysis conducted), showed overall improvements in exacerbation rate and some passed MCID. No OCS studies were identified. No included studies provided systematic assessment of severe asthma according to current guidelines.

conclusionsOmalizumab provides clinically relevant improvements in exacerbation rate among children, adolescents, and adults and in OCS-reduction among adults. New studies incorporating a guideline-approached definition of severe asthma are warranted.

Indexed as

Anti-IgEOmalizumabSevere asthmaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32565844
PMCPMC7302157
OpenAlexW3036897859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.